EMHLF
Price
$0.23
Change
+$0.01 (+4.55%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
42.75M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MP
Price
$53.38
Change
-$1.16 (-2.13%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
9.46B
54 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMHLF vs MP

Header iconEMHLF vs MP Comparison
Open Charts EMHLF vs MPBanner chart's image
European Metals Holdings
Price$0.23
Change+$0.01 (+4.55%)
Volume$5.2K
Capitalization42.75M
MP Materials
Price$53.38
Change-$1.16 (-2.13%)
Volume$3.94M
Capitalization9.46B
EMHLF vs MP Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMHLF vs. MP commentary
Dec 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMHLF is a Hold and MP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2025
Stock price -- (EMHLF: $0.23 vs. MP: $53.38)
Brand notoriety: EMHLF and MP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMHLF: 18% vs. MP: 40%
Market capitalization -- EMHLF: $42.75M vs. MP: $9.46B
EMHLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $42.75M. MP’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $9.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMHLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EMHLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MP is a better buy in the long-term than EMHLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMHLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMHLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MP is a better buy in the short-term than EMHLF.

Price Growth

EMHLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -12.54% price change this week, while MP (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -1.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +8.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

MP is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+8.93% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MP($9.46B) has a higher market cap than EMHLF($42.7M). MP YTD gains are higher at: 242.179 vs. EMHLF (171.991).
EMHLFMPEMHLF / MP
Capitalization42.7M9.46B0%
EBITDAN/A-47.16M-
Gain YTD171.991242.17971%
P/E RatioN/A770.50-
RevenueN/A233M-
Total CashN/A1.94B-
Total DebtN/A997M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMHLFMP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMHLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DHY2.010.01
+0.50%
Credit Suisse High Yield
DSTX32.380.11
+0.33%
Distillate Intntnl Fndmntl Stblty&Vl ETF
CPRA26.540.01
+0.02%
Calamos Russell 2000 Str Alt Prt ETF-Apr
SCHQ31.84-0.07
-0.22%
Schwab Long-Term US Treasury ETF
WHTX9.39-0.05
-0.53%
2x Wheat ETF

EMHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMHLF and BTRYF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMHLF and BTRYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMHLF
1D Price
Change %
EMHLF100%
+4.44%
BTRYF - EMHLF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MP - EMHLF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.13%
ASMMF - EMHLF
2%
Poorly correlated
+8.27%
MKNGF - EMHLF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FKMCF - EMHLF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
More

MP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MP has been loosely correlated with UAMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MP jumps, then UAMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MP
1D Price
Change %
MP100%
-2.13%
UAMY - MP
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.73%
USAR - MP
47%
Loosely correlated
-7.02%
LYSDY - MP
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.17%
FSUGY - MP
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
TMC - MP
43%
Loosely correlated
-10.50%
More