EMHLF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.02 (-14.29%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
23.01M
MKNGF
Price
$0.50
Change
+$0.03 (+6.38%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
170.23M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMHLF vs MKNGF

Header iconEMHLF vs MKNGF Comparison
Open Charts EMHLF vs MKNGFBanner chart's image
European Metals Holdings
Price$0.12
Change-$0.02 (-14.29%)
Volume$400
Capitalization23.01M
MKANGO RES
Price$0.50
Change+$0.03 (+6.38%)
Volume$900
Capitalization170.23M
EMHLF vs MKNGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EMHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MKNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMHLF vs. MKNGF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMHLF is a Hold and MKNGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (EMHLF: $0.12 vs. MKNGF: $0.50)
Brand notoriety: EMHLF and MKNGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMHLF: 1% vs. MKNGF: 5%
Market capitalization -- EMHLF: $23.01M vs. MKNGF: $170.23M
EMHLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $23.01M. MKNGF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $170.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMHLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMKNGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EMHLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MKNGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MKNGF is a better buy in the long-term than EMHLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMHLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MKNGF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMHLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MKNGF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MKNGF is a better buy in the short-term than EMHLF.

Price Growth

EMHLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -16.12% price change this week, while MKNGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -17.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MKNGF($170M) has a higher market cap than EMHLF($23M). MKNGF YTD gains are higher at: 317.647 vs. EMHLF (40.278).
EMHLFMKNGFEMHLF / MKNGF
Capitalization23M170M14%
EBITDAN/A-1.1M-
Gain YTD40.278317.64713%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A3.03M-
Total DebtN/A1.2M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMHLFMKNGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MKNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRERX27.800.25
+0.91%
Principal Real Estate Securities R3
DRGTX105.100.73
+0.70%
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology Inst
HMCNX15.39N/A
N/A
Harbor Mid Cap Investor
SUSYX15.13N/A
N/A
SEI US Managed Volatility Y (SIMT)
OEPIX67.91-1.26
-1.82%
Oil Equipment&Svcs UltraSector Pro Inv

EMHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMHLF and ABRMF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMHLF and ABRMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMHLF
1D Price
Change %
EMHLF100%
-16.12%
ABRMF - EMHLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ESKYF - EMHLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.73%
BTRYF - EMHLF
10%
Poorly correlated
+5.31%
MKNGF - EMHLF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRIOF - EMHLF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MKNGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MKNGF and GRDAF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MKNGF and GRDAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MKNGF
1D Price
Change %
MKNGF100%
N/A
GRDAF - MKNGF
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.10%
UURAF - MKNGF
27%
Poorly correlated
+8.48%
ABRMF - MKNGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TKRFF - MKNGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.05%
MALRY - MKNGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
More