EMHLF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.01 (-8.33%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
121.16M
ESKYF
Price
$0.34
Change
+$0.06 (+21.43%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
48.92M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMHLF vs ESKYF

Header iconEMHLF vs ESKYF Comparison
Open Charts EMHLF vs ESKYFBanner chart's image
European Metals Holdings
Price$0.11
Change-$0.01 (-8.33%)
Volume$30.55K
Capitalization121.16M
Eskay Mining
Price$0.34
Change+$0.06 (+21.43%)
Volume$179.19K
Capitalization48.92M
EMHLF vs ESKYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EMHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ESKYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMHLF vs. ESKYF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMHLF is a Hold and ESKYF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (EMHLF: $0.11 vs. ESKYF: $0.34)
Brand notoriety: EMHLF and ESKYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMHLF: 145% vs. ESKYF: 360%
Market capitalization -- EMHLF: $121.16M vs. ESKYF: $48.92M
EMHLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $121.16M. ESKYF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $48.92M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMHLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileESKYF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EMHLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ESKYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ESKYF is a better buy in the long-term than EMHLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMHLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ESKYF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMHLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ESKYF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ESKYF is a better buy in the short-term than EMHLF.

Price Growth

EMHLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -5.98% price change this week, while ESKYF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +13.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMHLF($121M) has a higher market cap than ESKYF($48.9M). ESKYF YTD gains are higher at: 172.472 vs. EMHLF (27.315). ESKYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.64M vs. EMHLF (-7.27M). EMHLF has more cash in the bank: 17.5M vs. ESKYF (648K). EMHLF has less debt than ESKYF: EMHLF (64K) vs ESKYF (2.78M). EMHLF has higher revenues than ESKYF: EMHLF (1.1M) vs ESKYF (0).
EMHLFESKYFEMHLF / ESKYF
Capitalization121M48.9M247%
EBITDA-7.27M-1.64M443%
Gain YTD27.315172.47216%
P/E Ratio28.82N/A-
Revenue1.1M0-
Total Cash17.5M648K2,701%
Total Debt64K2.78M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ESKYF: Fundamental Ratings
ESKYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMHLFESKYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ESKYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSUMF10.750.20
+1.90%
FORTESCUE LTD.
TORXF32.070.09
+0.28%
Torex Gold Resources, Inc.
MRVGF1.50N/A
N/A
Mirvac Group
PREIF0.07N/A
N/A
Precipitate Gold Corp
HYSR0.04N/A
-1.66%
SunHydrogen Inc.

EMHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMHLF and ABRMF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMHLF and ABRMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMHLF
1D Price
Change %
EMHLF100%
-5.01%
ABRMF - EMHLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QCCUF - EMHLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.02%
ESKYF - EMHLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+19.46%
BTRYF - EMHLF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MKNGF - EMHLF
10%
Poorly correlated
+36.87%
More

ESKYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ESKYF and SLVDF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ESKYF and SLVDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESKYF
1D Price
Change %
ESKYF100%
+19.46%
SLVDF - ESKYF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.23%
EMHLF - ESKYF
20%
Poorly correlated
-5.01%
MALRF - ESKYF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ERVFF - ESKYF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ERMAF - ESKYF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More