EMHLF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.02 (-14.29%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
23.01M
ESKYF
Price
$0.26
Change
+$0.01 (+4.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
49.36M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMHLF vs ESKYF

Header iconEMHLF vs ESKYF Comparison
Open Charts EMHLF vs ESKYFBanner chart's image
European Metals Holdings
Price$0.12
Change-$0.02 (-14.29%)
Volume$400
Capitalization23.01M
Eskay Mining
Price$0.26
Change+$0.01 (+4.00%)
Volume$20.98K
Capitalization49.36M
EMHLF vs ESKYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EMHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ESKYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMHLF vs. ESKYF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMHLF is a Hold and ESKYF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (EMHLF: $0.12 vs. ESKYF: $0.26)
Brand notoriety: EMHLF and ESKYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMHLF: 1% vs. ESKYF: 51%
Market capitalization -- EMHLF: $23.01M vs. ESKYF: $49.36M
EMHLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $23.01M. ESKYF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $49.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMHLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileESKYF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EMHLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ESKYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ESKYF is a better buy in the long-term than EMHLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMHLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ESKYF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMHLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ESKYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both EMHLF and ESKYF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

EMHLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -16.12% price change this week, while ESKYF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +8.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ESKYF($49.4M) has a higher market cap than EMHLF($23M). ESKYF YTD gains are higher at: 106.260 vs. EMHLF (40.278).
EMHLFESKYFEMHLF / ESKYF
Capitalization23M49.4M47%
EBITDAN/A-1.72M-
Gain YTD40.278106.26038%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A3.33M-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ESKYF: Fundamental Ratings
ESKYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
49

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMHLFESKYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ESKYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KRDXF395.24N/A
N/A
Kardex Holding AG
UNIRF4.87N/A
N/A
Unibail Rodamco
ENDGF0.19N/A
N/A
Endurance Gold Corp.
TTGXF0.02N/A
N/A
Trans Canada Gold Corp.
KBRLF27.03-0.57
-2.07%
K-Bro Linen, Inc.

EMHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMHLF and ABRMF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMHLF and ABRMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMHLF
1D Price
Change %
EMHLF100%
-16.12%
ABRMF - EMHLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ESKYF - EMHLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.73%
BTRYF - EMHLF
10%
Poorly correlated
+5.31%
MKNGF - EMHLF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRIOF - EMHLF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ESKYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ESKYF and SLVDF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ESKYF and SLVDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESKYF
1D Price
Change %
ESKYF100%
+3.73%
SLVDF - ESKYF
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.75%
EMHLF - ESKYF
20%
Poorly correlated
-16.12%
MALRF - ESKYF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ERVFF - ESKYF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ERMAF - ESKYF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More