EMHLF
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
121.16M
ESKYF
Price
$0.27
Change
+$0.05 (+22.73%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
48.92M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMHLF vs ESKYF

Header iconEMHLF vs ESKYF Comparison
Open Charts EMHLF vs ESKYFBanner chart's image
European Metals Holdings
Price$0.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$18.73K
Capitalization121.16M
Eskay Mining
Price$0.27
Change+$0.05 (+22.73%)
Volume$164.68K
Capitalization48.92M
EMHLF vs ESKYF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMHLF vs. ESKYF commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMHLF is a Hold and ESKYF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (EMHLF: $0.13 vs. ESKYF: $0.27)
Brand notoriety: EMHLF and ESKYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMHLF: 130% vs. ESKYF: 358%
Market capitalization -- EMHLF: $121.16M vs. ESKYF: $48.92M
EMHLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $121.16M. ESKYF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $48.92M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMHLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileESKYF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EMHLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ESKYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ESKYF is a better buy in the long-term than EMHLF.

Price Growth

EMHLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +1.54% price change this week, while ESKYF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +29.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.32% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMHLF($121M) has a higher market cap than ESKYF($48.9M). ESKYF YTD gains are higher at: 116.613 vs. EMHLF (52.778). ESKYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.64M vs. EMHLF (-7.27M). EMHLF has more cash in the bank: 17.5M vs. ESKYF (648K). EMHLF has less debt than ESKYF: EMHLF (64K) vs ESKYF (2.78M). EMHLF has higher revenues than ESKYF: EMHLF (1.1M) vs ESKYF (0).
EMHLFESKYFEMHLF / ESKYF
Capitalization121M48.9M247%
EBITDA-7.27M-1.64M443%
Gain YTD52.778116.61345%
P/E Ratio28.82N/A-
Revenue1.1M0-
Total Cash17.5M648K2,701%
Total Debt64K2.78M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ESKYF: Fundamental Ratings
ESKYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
93
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OEPSX58.081.13
+1.98%
Oil Equipment&Svcs UltraSector Pro Svc
DGOYX42.60-0.27
-0.63%
Davis Opportunity Y
HFQIX6.95-0.06
-0.86%
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income I
IINCX24.16-0.35
-1.43%
Macquarie International Core Eq R6
DRSVX16.67-0.37
-2.17%
North Square Small Cap Value Investor

EMHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMHLF and ABRMF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMHLF and ABRMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMHLF
1D Price
Change %
EMHLF100%
+1.54%
ABRMF - EMHLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QCCUF - EMHLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.28%
ESKYF - EMHLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+20.12%
BTRYF - EMHLF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MKNGF - EMHLF
10%
Poorly correlated
+19.95%
More

ESKYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ESKYF and SLVDF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ESKYF and SLVDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESKYF
1D Price
Change %
ESKYF100%
+20.12%
SLVDF - ESKYF
24%
Poorly correlated
+6.81%
EMHLF - ESKYF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
MALRF - ESKYF
20%
Poorly correlated
+45.30%
SAMMF - ESKYF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ERVFF - ESKYF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More