Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMGNX vs RNWBX
EMGNX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EMGNX vs RNWBX
Allspring Emerging Markets Equity Inst
Price$34.56
Change+$0.29 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.61B
American Funds New World R2
Price$88.91
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
EMGNX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMGNX vs. RNWBX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMGNX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. EMGNX (3.61B). EMGNX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EMGNX (1.01) vs RNWBX (0.12). EMGNX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EMGNX (15 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than EMGNX (1.20). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. EMGNX (10.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMGNX: RNWBX (250) vs EMGNX (1000000). EMGNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.81 vs. RNWBX (19.18). EMGNX return over 5 years is better than : 8.37 vs. RNWBX (7.90).
| EMGNX | RNWBX | EMGNX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.67 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.67 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.539 | 20.884 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.61B | 75.3B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 0.12 | 854% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.81 | 19.18 | 166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.22 | 41.02 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.37 | 7.90 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.51 | 82.81 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement