EMGDF
Price
$0.22
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
16.76M
SAVNF
Price
$0.06
Change
+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
132.42M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMGDF vs SAVNF

Header iconEMGDF vs SAVNF Comparison
Open Charts EMGDF vs SAVNFBanner chart's image
EMINENT GOLD
Price$0.22
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$35.05K
Capitalization16.76M
SAVANNAH RESOURCES
Price$0.06
Change+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Volume$20K
Capitalization132.42M
EMGDF vs SAVNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EMGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAVNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMGDF vs. SAVNF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMGDF is a Hold and SAVNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (EMGDF: $0.22 vs. SAVNF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: EMGDF and SAVNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMGDF: 134% vs. SAVNF: 40%
Market capitalization -- EMGDF: $16.76M vs. SAVNF: $132.42M
EMGDF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $16.76M. SAVNF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $132.42M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMGDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSAVNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EMGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SAVNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SAVNF is a better buy in the long-term than EMGDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMGDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAVNF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMGDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SAVNF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EMGDF is a better buy in the short-term than SAVNF.

Price Growth

EMGDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -8.99% price change this week, while SAVNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -4.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +50.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+6.26% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAVNF($132M) has a higher market cap than EMGDF($16.8M). SAVNF YTD gains are higher at: 12.868 vs. EMGDF (-25.181).
EMGDFSAVNFEMGDF / SAVNF
Capitalization16.8M132M13%
EBITDA-1.58MN/A-
Gain YTD-25.18112.868-196%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash1.95MN/A-
Total Debt100KN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMGDFSAVNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAVNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CYSNF0.690.05
+8.00%
C-COM Satellite Systems Inc.
CLOW0.02N/A
+3.03%
Cloudweb, Inc.
LBTSF13.36N/A
N/A
Almirall SA
ASEKY17.22N/A
N/A
Aisin Corporation
CEIEF0.59N/A
N/A
COELACANTH ENERGY INC

EMGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMGDF and FLMCF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMGDF and FLMCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMGDF
1D Price
Change %
EMGDF100%
-0.51%
FLMCF - EMGDF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZZZOF - EMGDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
REMRF - EMGDF
22%
Poorly correlated
+6.57%
MNXXF - EMGDF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
SLGGF - EMGDF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.29%
More

SAVNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SAVNF and LAC have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SAVNF and LAC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAVNF
1D Price
Change %
SAVNF100%
+4.45%
LAC - SAVNF
20%
Poorly correlated
-14.11%
EMGDF - SAVNF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
IONGF - SAVNF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VULNF - SAVNF
0%
Poorly correlated
+15.02%
ZNCXF - SAVNF
-5%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
More