EMGDF
Price
$0.28
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
10.65M
REMRF
Price
$0.31
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
92.68M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMGDF vs REMRF

Header iconEMGDF vs REMRF Comparison
Open Charts EMGDF vs REMRFBanner chart's image
EMINENT GOLD
Price$0.28
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$34.8K
Capitalization10.65M
ATLAS SALT
Price$0.31
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$12.04K
Capitalization92.68M
EMGDF vs REMRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EMGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
REMRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMGDF vs. REMRF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMGDF is a Hold and REMRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (EMGDF: $0.28 vs. REMRF: $0.31)
Brand notoriety: EMGDF and REMRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMGDF: 355% vs. REMRF: 94%
Market capitalization -- EMGDF: $10.65M vs. REMRF: $92.68M
EMGDF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $10.65M. REMRF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $92.68M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMGDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileREMRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EMGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • REMRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EMGDF is a better buy in the long-term than REMRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMGDF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while REMRF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMGDF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • REMRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EMGDF is a better buy in the short-term than REMRF.

Price Growth

EMGDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +10.72% price change this week, while REMRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +1.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.18% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REMRF($92.7M) has a higher market cap than EMGDF($10.6M). EMGDF YTD gains are higher at: -4.974 vs. REMRF (-27.756). EMGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.29M vs. REMRF (-4.72M). REMRF has more cash in the bank: 17.4M vs. EMGDF (78.2K). EMGDF (0) and REMRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
EMGDFREMRFEMGDF / REMRF
Capitalization10.6M92.7M11%
EBITDA-1.29M-4.72M27%
Gain YTD-4.974-27.75618%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash78.2K17.4M0%
Total Debt150KN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMGDFREMRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
REMRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSBVX12.120.06
+0.50%
Morgan Stanley American Resilience I
FWOZX17.870.07
+0.39%
Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership Z
FMUIX14.980.04
+0.27%
Federated Hermes Muni and Stock Adv IS
UGOFX12.170.01
+0.08%
Victory Global Managed Volatility Instl
PRPHX66.26-0.05
-0.08%
Permanent Portfolio Permanent C

EMGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMGDF and FLMCF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMGDF and FLMCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMGDF
1D Price
Change %
EMGDF100%
-1.75%
FLMCF - EMGDF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZZZOF - EMGDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
REMRF - EMGDF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
MNXXF - EMGDF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.63%
SLGGF - EMGDF
22%
Poorly correlated
+10.67%
More

REMRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that REMRF and VULMF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that REMRF and VULMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To REMRF
1D Price
Change %
REMRF100%
+0.65%
VULMF - REMRF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNXXF - REMRF
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.63%
ABRMF - REMRF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMGDF - REMRF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.75%
GRDAF - REMRF
21%
Poorly correlated
-8.33%
More