EMGDF
Price
$0.28
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
10.65M
FLMCF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Mar 27 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMGDF vs FLMCF

Header iconEMGDF vs FLMCF Comparison
Open Charts EMGDF vs FLMCFBanner chart's image
EMINENT GOLD
Price$0.28
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$12.25K
Capitalization10.65M
First Lithium Minerals
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6K
CapitalizationN/A
EMGDF vs FLMCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EMGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMGDF vs. FLMCF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMGDF is a Hold and FLMCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (EMGDF: $0.28 vs. FLMCF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: EMGDF and FLMCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMGDF: 81% vs. FLMCF: 100%
Market capitalization -- EMGDF: $10.65M vs. FLMCF: $0
EMGDF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $10.65M. FLMCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMGDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFLMCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EMGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FLMCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EMGDF and FLMCF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMGDF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • EMGDF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

EMGDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +10.39% price change this week, while FLMCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLMCF YTD gains are higher at: 27.009 vs. EMGDF (-1.962).
EMGDFFLMCFEMGDF / FLMCF
Capitalization10.6MN/A-
EBITDA-1.29MN/A-
Gain YTD-1.96227.009-7%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash78.2KN/A-
Total Debt150KN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMGDFFLMCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IPWR4.700.21
+4.68%
Ideal Power
MCB74.911.45
+1.97%
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp
PEB10.660.13
+1.23%
Pebblebrook Hotel Trust
GPK22.02-0.01
-0.05%
Graphic Packaging Holding Company
RILYP2.17-0.04
-2.03%
B. Riley Financial

EMGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMGDF and FLMCF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMGDF and FLMCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMGDF
1D Price
Change %
EMGDF100%
+3.00%
FLMCF - EMGDF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZZZOF - EMGDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
REMRF - EMGDF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
MNXXF - EMGDF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
SLGGF - EMGDF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
More

FLMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLMCF has been loosely correlated with JIAXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLMCF jumps, then JIAXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLMCF
1D Price
Change %
FLMCF100%
N/A
JIAXF - FLMCF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
EUEMF - FLMCF
30%
Poorly correlated
+18.06%
JUBPF - FLMCF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMGDF - FLMCF
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.00%
ARAFF - FLMCF
22%
Poorly correlated
+12.57%
More