Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMGCX vs RNWBX
EMGCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EMGCX vs RNWBX
Allspring Emerging Markets Equity C
Price$27.33
Change+$0.04 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.68B
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.79
Change-$0.09 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.73B
EMGCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMGCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMGCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.7B vs. EMGCX (3.68B). EMGCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EMGCX (0.24) vs RNWBX (0.12). EMGCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EMGCX (31 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). EMGCX (2.27) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. EMGCX (10.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMGCX: RNWBX (250) vs EMGCX (1000). EMGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.94 vs. RNWBX (14.20). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.32 vs. EMGCX (18.17).
| EMGCX | RNWBX | EMGCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.18 | 1.67 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.27 | 1.67 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.093 | 23.440 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.68B | 74.7B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 0.12 | 202% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.94 | 14.20 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.51 | 54.19 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.17 | 24.32 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.61 | 85.87 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement