Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMFIX vs RNWHX
EMFIX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EMFIX vs RNWHX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Instl
Price$15.70
Change+$1.78 (+12.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets267.91M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.53
Change+$2.43 (+2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
EMFIX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMFIX vs. RNWHX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMFIX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. EMFIX (268M). EMFIX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: EMFIX (1.50) vs RNWHX (1.25). EMFIX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EMFIX (15 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). EMFIX (1.49) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). EMFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMFIX: RNWHX (250) vs EMFIX (1000000). EMFIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 47.91 vs. RNWHX (27.68). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 11.69 vs. EMFIX (0.05).
| EMFIX | RNWHX | EMFIX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.72 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 0.72 | 207% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.333 | 6.092 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 268M | 75.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.50 | 1.25 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 47.91 | 27.68 | 173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.56 | 43.24 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.05 | 11.69 | 0% |
| Returns for 10 years | 195.59 | 124.21 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers