Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMFIX vs RNWHX
EMFIX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EMFIX vs RNWHX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Instl
Price$12.54
Change-$0.05 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.55M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$89.02
Change-$0.41 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.79B
EMFIX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMFIX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMFIX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 70.8B vs. EMFIX (200M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than EMFIX: RNWHX (0.99) vs EMFIX (0.81). EMFIX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EMFIX (14 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). EMFIX (1.49) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). EMFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMFIX: RNWHX (250) vs EMFIX (1000000). EMFIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.35 vs. RNWHX (16.04). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 29.58 vs. EMFIX (10.86).
| EMFIX | RNWHX | EMFIX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.72 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 0.72 | 207% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.311 | 17.101 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 200M | 70.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 0.99 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.35 | 16.04 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.96 | 40.30 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.86 | 29.58 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.37 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers