Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMFIX vs RNWHX
EMFIX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EMFIX vs RNWHX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Instl
Price$14.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.48M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$96.26
Change+$0.16 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
EMFIX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMFIX vs. RNWHX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMFIX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. EMFIX (244M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than EMFIX: RNWHX (0.91) vs EMFIX (0.77). EMFIX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EMFIX (14 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). EMFIX (1.49) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). EMFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMFIX: RNWHX (250) vs EMFIX (1000000). EMFIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.97 vs. RNWHX (20.02). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 18.77 vs. EMFIX (2.96).
| EMFIX | RNWHX | EMFIX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.72 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 0.72 | 207% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.364 | 25.862 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 244M | 75.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 0.91 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.97 | 20.02 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.67 | 43.48 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.96 | 18.77 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 126.41 | 93.48 | 135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement