Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMFIX vs RNWBX
EMFIX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EMFIX vs RNWBX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Instl
Price$12.54
Change-$0.05 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.55M
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.67
Change-$0.40 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.79B
EMFIX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMFIX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMFIX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.8B vs. EMFIX (200M). EMFIX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EMFIX (0.81) vs RNWBX (0.13). EMFIX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EMFIX (14 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than EMFIX (1.49). EMFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMFIX: RNWBX (250) vs EMFIX (1000000). EMFIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.35 vs. RNWBX (14.84). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.82 vs. EMFIX (10.86).
| EMFIX | RNWBX | EMFIX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.67 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.67 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.311 | 16.479 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 200M | 70.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 0.13 | 636% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.35 | 14.84 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.96 | 37.52 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.86 | 24.82 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.37 | 66.54 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers