Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMFIX vs RNWBX
EMFIX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EMFIX vs RNWBX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Instl
Price$14.12
Change+$0.07 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets248.51M
American Funds New World R2
Price$88.71
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
EMFIX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMFIX vs. RNWBX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMFIX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. EMFIX (249M). EMFIX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EMFIX (0.77) vs RNWBX (0.12). EMFIX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EMFIX (15 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than EMFIX (1.49). EMFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMFIX: RNWBX (250) vs EMFIX (1000000). EMFIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.67 vs. RNWBX (18.68). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.66 vs. EMFIX (1.27).
| EMFIX | RNWBX | EMFIX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.67 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.67 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.551 | 20.612 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 249M | 75.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 0.12 | 655% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.67 | 18.68 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.68 | 40.84 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.27 | 7.66 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.35 | 83.29 | 156% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers