EMFGF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
43.37M
QUTIF
Price
$0.33
Change
+$0.13 (+65.00%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
9.21M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMFGF vs QUTIF

Header iconEMFGF vs QUTIF Comparison
Open Charts EMFGF vs QUTIFBanner chart's image
Fluence
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization43.37M
Questor Technology
Price$0.33
Change+$0.13 (+65.00%)
Volume$20.5K
Capitalization9.21M
EMFGF vs QUTIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EMFGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QUTIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMFGF vs. QUTIF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMFGF is a Hold and QUTIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (EMFGF: $0.04 vs. QUTIF: $0.33)
Brand notoriety: EMFGF and QUTIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMFGF: 92% vs. QUTIF: 146%
Market capitalization -- EMFGF: $43.37M vs. QUTIF: $9.21M
EMFGF [@Industrial Specialties] is valued at $43.37M. QUTIF’s [@Industrial Specialties] market capitalization is $9.21M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Specialties] industry ranges from $26.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Specialties] industry is $1.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMFGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQUTIF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EMFGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QUTIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, QUTIF is a better buy in the long-term than EMFGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMFGF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QUTIF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMFGF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • QUTIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EMFGF is a better buy in the short-term than QUTIF.

Price Growth

EMFGF (@Industrial Specialties) experienced а -0.57% price change this week, while QUTIF (@Industrial Specialties) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Specialties industry was -0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Specialties (-0.68% weekly)

Companies in the industrial specialties industry process basic materials and minerals into various specialty products, such as flat and safety glass, fire retardant products, paints and coatings. Examples of companies operating in this industry are Sherwin-Williams Company, PPG Industries, Inc. and RPM International Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMFGF($43.4M) has a higher market cap than QUTIF($9.21M). QUTIF YTD gains are higher at: 37.500 vs. EMFGF (8.376).
EMFGFQUTIFEMFGF / QUTIF
Capitalization43.4M9.21M471%
EBITDAN/A-548.25K-
Gain YTD8.37637.50022%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A6.15M-
Total CashN/A5.09M-
Total DebtN/A914K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMFGF vs QUTIF: Fundamental Ratings
EMFGF
QUTIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8647
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9894
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4735
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1001
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4139

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EMFGF's Valuation (78) in the null industry is in the same range as QUTIF (89). This means that EMFGF’s stock grew similarly to QUTIF’s over the last 12 months.

EMFGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as QUTIF (100). This means that EMFGF’s stock grew similarly to QUTIF’s over the last 12 months.

QUTIF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as EMFGF (98). This means that QUTIF’s stock grew similarly to EMFGF’s over the last 12 months.

QUTIF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as EMFGF (47). This means that QUTIF’s stock grew similarly to EMFGF’s over the last 12 months.

QUTIF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EMFGF (100). This means that QUTIF’s stock grew significantly faster than EMFGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMFGFQUTIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMFGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QUTIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WIX124.353.96
+3.29%
Wix.com Ltd
GOOGL203.900.96
+0.47%
Alphabet
BKHA10.980.02
+0.21%
Black Hawk Acquisition Corp.
CBRL62.19-0.36
-0.58%
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store
TRAK16.43-0.10
-0.60%
ReposiTrak

EMFGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMFGF and QUTIF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMFGF and QUTIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMFGF
1D Price
Change %
EMFGF100%
N/A
QUTIF - EMFGF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HIZOF - EMFGF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ECTXF - EMFGF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EBCOY - EMFGF
7%
Poorly correlated
+7.05%
DURYY - EMFGF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
More

QUTIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QUTIF and EMFGF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QUTIF and EMFGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QUTIF
1D Price
Change %
QUTIF100%
N/A
EMFGF - QUTIF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCHRF - QUTIF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IMIAF - QUTIF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MDMXF - QUTIF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PFFVF - QUTIF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More