Advertisement
EMFGF vs QUTIF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMFGF is a Hold and QUTIF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EMFGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQUTIF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- EMFGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- QUTIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EMFGF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QUTIF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EMFGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- QUTIF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
EMFGF (@Industrial Specialties) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while QUTIF (@Industrial Specialties) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Specialties industry was +2.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +122.65%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Specialties (+2.78% weekly)Companies in the industrial specialties industry process basic materials and minerals into various specialty products, such as flat and safety glass, fire retardant products, paints and coatings. Examples of companies operating in this industry are Sherwin-Williams Company, PPG Industries, Inc. and RPM International Inc.
| EMFGF | QUTIF | EMFGF / QUTIF | |
| Capitalization | 41.2M | 12.2M | 338% |
| EBITDA | -13.19M | -548.25K | 2,407% |
| Gain YTD | -11.751 | 79.167 | -15% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 64.5M | 6.15M | 1,049% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 5.09M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 914K | - |
EMFGF | QUTIF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 47 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EMFGF's Valuation (76) in the null industry is in the same range as QUTIF (89). This means that EMFGF’s stock grew similarly to QUTIF’s over the last 12 months.
EMFGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as QUTIF (100). This means that EMFGF’s stock grew similarly to QUTIF’s over the last 12 months.
QUTIF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as EMFGF (99). This means that QUTIF’s stock grew similarly to EMFGF’s over the last 12 months.
QUTIF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as EMFGF (65). This means that QUTIF’s stock grew similarly to EMFGF’s over the last 12 months.
QUTIF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EMFGF (100). This means that QUTIF’s stock grew significantly faster than EMFGF’s over the last 12 months.
| EMFGF | QUTIF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 48% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 45% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 52% |
Advertisement
EMFGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EMFGF and QUTIF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMFGF and QUTIF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMFGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMFGF | 100% | N/A | ||
| QUTIF - EMFGF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HIZOF - EMFGF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ECTXF - EMFGF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EBCOY - EMFGF | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.97% | ||
| DURYY - EMFGF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
QUTIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that QUTIF and EMFGF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QUTIF and EMFGF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QUTIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUTIF | 100% | N/A | ||
| EMFGF - QUTIF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FCHRF - QUTIF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IMIAF - QUTIF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MDMXF - QUTIF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PFFVF - QUTIF | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||