Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMECX vs RNWHX
EMECX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EMECX vs RNWHX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity C
Price$14.97
Change+$1.68 (+12.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets267.91M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.53
Change+$2.43 (+2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
EMECX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMECX vs. RNWHX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMECX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. EMECX (268M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than EMECX: RNWHX (1.25) vs EMECX (0.97). EMECX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EMECX (13 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). EMECX (2.48) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). EMECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMECX: RNWHX (250) vs EMECX (1000). EMECX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 46.45 vs. RNWHX (27.68). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 11.69 vs. EMECX (-5.35).
| EMECX | RNWHX | EMECX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 0.72 | 285% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.48 | 0.72 | 344% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.265 | 6.092 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 268M | 75.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 1.25 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 46.45 | 27.68 | 168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.99 | 43.24 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.35 | 11.69 | -46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.44 | 124.21 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers