Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMECX vs RNWHX
EMECX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EMECX vs RNWHX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity C
Price$13.41
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.53M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$96.10
Change+$0.42 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.17B
EMECX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMECX vs. RNWHX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMECX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.2B vs. EMECX (245M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than EMECX: RNWHX (0.91) vs EMECX (0.23). EMECX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EMECX (13 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). EMECX (2.48) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). EMECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMECX: RNWHX (250) vs EMECX (1000). EMECX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.69 vs. RNWHX (20.02). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 18.77 vs. EMECX (-2.64).
| EMECX | RNWHX | EMECX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 0.72 | 285% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.48 | 0.72 | 344% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.227 | 25.862 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 245M | 75.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.91 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.69 | 20.02 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.03 | 43.48 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.64 | 18.77 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.89 | 93.48 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers