Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMEAX vs RNWHX
EMEAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EMEAX vs RNWHX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity A
Price$14.70
Change-$0.17 (-1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets243.2M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$96.22
Change-$1.24 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.61B
EMEAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMEAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMEAX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 76.6B vs. EMEAX (243M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than EMEAX: RNWHX (0.90) vs EMEAX (0.58). EMEAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EMEAX (14 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). EMEAX (1.76) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). EMEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMEAX: RNWHX (250) vs EMEAX (1000). EMEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.55 vs. RNWHX (20.99). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 24.39 vs. EMEAX (8.71).
| EMEAX | RNWHX | EMEAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.72 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 0.72 | 244% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.910 | 26.572 | 128% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 243M | 76.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.90 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.55 | 20.99 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.01 | 48.72 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.71 | 24.39 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers