Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMEAX vs RNWHX
EMEAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EMEAX vs RNWHX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity A
Price$15.40
Change-$0.02 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.68M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$95.66
Change-$0.26 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
EMEAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMEAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMEAX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. EMEAX (263M). EMEAX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: EMEAX (1.42) vs RNWHX (1.33). EMEAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EMEAX (14 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). EMEAX (1.76) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). EMEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMEAX: RNWHX (250) vs EMEAX (1000). EMEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.56 vs. RNWHX (28.86). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.21 vs. EMEAX (-1.77).
| EMEAX | RNWHX | EMEAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.72 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 0.72 | 244% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.054 | 4.057 | 100% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 263M | 75.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 1.33 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.56 | 28.86 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.14 | 42.44 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.77 | 13.21 | -13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 184.84 | 121.60 | 152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement