Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMEAX vs RNWHX
EMEAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EMEAX vs RNWHX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity A
Price$14.64
Change-$0.11 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets246.78M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$96.23
Change-$0.78 (-0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
EMEAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMEAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Dec 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMEAX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. EMEAX (247M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than EMEAX: RNWHX (0.91) vs EMEAX (0.59). EMEAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EMEAX (14 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). EMEAX (1.76) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). EMEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMEAX: RNWHX (250) vs EMEAX (1000). EMEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.08 vs. RNWHX (19.18). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 19.36 vs. EMEAX (2.71).
| EMEAX | RNWHX | EMEAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.72 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 0.72 | 244% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.189 | 27.611 | 120% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 247M | 75.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.91 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.08 | 19.18 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.02 | 47.28 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.71 | 19.36 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.70 | 103.97 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers