Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMEAX vs RNWHX
EMEAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EMEAX vs RNWHX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity A
Price$12.37
Change-$0.23 (-1.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets179.27M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$84.97
Change-$1.04 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.74B
EMEAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMEAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMEAX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 67.7B vs. EMEAX (179M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than EMEAX: RNWHX (1.04) vs EMEAX (0.39). EMEAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EMEAX (13 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). EMEAX (1.76) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). EMEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMEAX: RNWHX (250) vs EMEAX (1000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.20 vs. EMEAX (7.64). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 33.47 vs. EMEAX (16.89).
| EMEAX | RNWHX | EMEAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.72 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 0.72 | 244% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.041 | 11.773 | 94% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 179M | 67.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 1.04 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.64 | 8.20 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.38 | 35.09 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.89 | 33.47 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.26 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement