Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMEAX vs RNWBX
EMEAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EMEAX vs RNWBX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity A
Price$14.76
Change+$0.09 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets250.21M
American Funds New World R2
Price$88.91
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
EMEAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMEAX vs. RNWBX commentary
Dec 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMEAX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. EMEAX (250M). EMEAX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EMEAX (0.59) vs RNWBX (0.12). EMEAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EMEAX (14 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). EMEAX (1.76) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). EMEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMEAX: RNWBX (250) vs EMEAX (1000). EMEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.46 vs. RNWBX (19.18). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.90 vs. EMEAX (1.93).
| EMEAX | RNWBX | EMEAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.67 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 1.67 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.919 | 20.884 | 158% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 250M | 75.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.12 | 498% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.46 | 19.18 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.91 | 41.02 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.93 | 7.90 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.70 | 82.81 | 158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement