EMCHF
Price
$0.62
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 5 closing price
HCP
Price
$34.06
Change
+$0.16 (+0.47%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
77 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EMCHF vs HCP

Header iconEMCHF vs HCP Comparison
Open Charts EMCHF vs HCPBanner chart's image
EML Payments
Price$0.62
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$67K
CapitalizationN/A
Hashi
Price$34.06
Change+$0.16 (+0.47%)
Volume$82.43K
CapitalizationN/A
EMCHF vs HCP Comparison Chart
Loading...
HCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMCHF vs. HCP commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMCHF is a Hold and HCP is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (EMCHF: $0.62 vs. HCP: $33.90)
Brand notoriety: EMCHF and HCP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMCHF: 301% vs. HCP: 139%
Market capitalization -- EMCHF: $300.53M vs. HCP: $5.15B
EMCHF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $300.53M. HCP’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $5.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMCHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHCP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EMCHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HCP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HCP is a better buy in the long-term than EMCHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HCP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HCP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

EMCHF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HCP (@Packaged Software) price change was +0.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

HCP is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.25% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HCP($5.15B) has a higher market cap than EMCHF($301M). HCP YTD gains are higher at: 43.401 vs. EMCHF (9.845). EMCHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -118.27M vs. HCP (-244.77M). EMCHF has more cash in the bank: 1.55B vs. HCP (1.28B). HCP has less debt than EMCHF: HCP (14M) vs EMCHF (45.1M). HCP has higher revenues than EMCHF: HCP (583M) vs EMCHF (235M).
EMCHFHCPEMCHF / HCP
Capitalization301M5.15B6%
EBITDA-118.27M-244.77M48%
Gain YTD9.84543.40123%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue235M583M40%
Total Cash1.55B1.28B121%
Total Debt45.1M14M322%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMCHF vs HCP: Fundamental Ratings
EMCHF
HCP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
976
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10084
SMR RATING
1..100
9894
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3949
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1656
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HCP's Valuation (10) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EMCHF (69) in the null industry. This means that HCP’s stock grew somewhat faster than EMCHF’s over the last 12 months.

HCP's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as EMCHF (100) in the null industry. This means that HCP’s stock grew similarly to EMCHF’s over the last 12 months.

HCP's SMR Rating (94) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as EMCHF (98) in the null industry. This means that HCP’s stock grew similarly to EMCHF’s over the last 12 months.

EMCHF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as HCP (49) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that EMCHF’s stock grew similarly to HCP’s over the last 12 months.

EMCHF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HCP (56) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that EMCHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HCP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HCP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

EMCHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMCHF and ARBE have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMCHF and ARBE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMCHF
1D Price
Change %
EMCHF100%
N/A
ARBE - EMCHF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.98%
VHIBF - EMCHF
21%
Poorly correlated
-7.46%
HCP - EMCHF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
ORCL - EMCHF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.53%
DSNY - EMCHF
9%
Poorly correlated
-6.67%
More

HCP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCP has been loosely correlated with INTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HCP jumps, then INTU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCP
1D Price
Change %
HCP100%
+0.18%
INTU - HCP
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
BSY - HCP
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.06%
AI - HCP
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
EVCM - HCP
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
RCM - HCP
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More