EMCHF
Price
$0.70
Change
+$0.02 (+2.94%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Capitalization
300.53M
FBSFF
Price
$18.00
Change
+$0.01 (+0.06%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
222.5M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMCHF vs FBSFF

Header iconEMCHF vs FBSFF Comparison
Open Charts EMCHF vs FBSFFBanner chart's image
EML Payments
Price$0.70
Change+$0.02 (+2.94%)
Volume$68.5K
Capitalization300.53M
Fabasoft AG
Price$18.00
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
Volume$100
Capitalization222.5M
EMCHF vs FBSFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EMCHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FBSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMCHF vs. FBSFF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMCHF is a Hold and FBSFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (EMCHF: $0.70 vs. FBSFF: $18.00)
Brand notoriety: EMCHF and FBSFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMCHF: 171% vs. FBSFF: 83%
Market capitalization -- EMCHF: $300.53M vs. FBSFF: $222.5M
EMCHF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $300.53M. FBSFF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $222.5M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMCHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFBSFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EMCHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FBSFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EMCHF and FBSFF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMCHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FBSFF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMCHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FBSFF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FBSFF is a better buy in the short-term than EMCHF.

Price Growth

EMCHF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FBSFF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.66%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.55% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMCHF($301M) has a higher market cap than FBSFF($222M). EMCHF YTD gains are higher at: 36.772 vs. FBSFF (15.311). FBSFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 17.4M vs. EMCHF (-118.27M). EMCHF has more cash in the bank: 1.55B vs. FBSFF (26.6M). FBSFF has less debt than EMCHF: FBSFF (7.49M) vs EMCHF (45.1M). EMCHF has higher revenues than FBSFF: EMCHF (235M) vs FBSFF (69.2M).
EMCHFFBSFFEMCHF / FBSFF
Capitalization301M222M136%
EBITDA-118.27M17.4M-680%
Gain YTD36.77215.311240%
P/E RatioN/A31.65-
Revenue235M69.2M340%
Total Cash1.55B26.6M5,831%
Total Debt45.1M7.49M602%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMCHF: Fundamental Ratings
EMCHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
16
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMCHFFBSFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
7%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
21%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMCHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FBSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRACX47.850.20
+0.42%
Putnam Research C
OSTVX16.860.06
+0.36%
Osterweis Growth & Income Fund
ITCSX29.950.06
+0.20%
VY® T. Rowe Price Capital Apprec S
GMNPX39.170.03
+0.08%
Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infras P
HUDEX24.38-0.02
-0.08%
Huber Large Cap Value Inst

EMCHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMCHF and ARBE have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMCHF and ARBE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMCHF
1D Price
Change %
EMCHF100%
N/A
ARBE - EMCHF
23%
Poorly correlated
-7.77%
VHIBF - EMCHF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
ORCL - EMCHF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
DSNY - EMCHF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DNACF - EMCHF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FBSFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBSFF and SWVL have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBSFF and SWVL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBSFF
1D Price
Change %
FBSFF100%
N/A
SWVL - FBSFF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
EBYH - FBSFF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OBLG - FBSFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.12%
EMCHF - FBSFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FMZNF - FBSFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More