EMCG
Price
$12.20
Change
+$0.05 (+0.41%)
Updated
Jul 2, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
82.69M
MSSUF
Price
$10.05
Change
-$1.84 (-15.48%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMCG vs MSSUF

Header iconEMCG vs MSSUF Comparison
Open Charts EMCG vs MSSUFBanner chart's image
Embrace Change Acquisition
Price$12.20
Change+$0.05 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization82.69M
Metal Sky Star Acquisition
Price$10.05
Change-$1.84 (-15.48%)
Volume$198
CapitalizationN/A
EMCG vs MSSUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EMCG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSSUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMCG vs. MSSUF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMCG is a Buy and MSSUF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (EMCG: $12.15 vs. MSSUF: $10.05)
Brand notoriety: EMCG and MSSUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMCG: 17% vs. MSSUF: 100%
Market capitalization -- EMCG: $82.69M vs. MSSUF: $0
EMCG [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $82.69M. MSSUF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMCG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMSSUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EMCG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MSSUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EMCG is a better buy in the long-term than MSSUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMCG’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSSUF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMCG’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • MSSUF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EMCG is a better buy in the short-term than MSSUF.

Price Growth

EMCG (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.41% price change this week, while MSSUF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-1.44% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMCG YTD gains are higher at: 4.024 vs. MSSUF (-14.758). MSSUF (-598.33K) and EMCG (-603.1K) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . EMCG (0) and MSSUF (0) have equivalent revenues.
EMCGMSSUFEMCG / MSSUF
Capitalization82.7MN/A-
EBITDA-603.1K-598.33K101%
Gain YTD4.024-14.758-27%
P/E Ratio37.13N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash287KN/A-
Total DebtN/A2.13M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMCG: Fundamental Ratings
EMCG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
87
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMCGMSSUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
24%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMCG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSSUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRIN14.290.09
+0.63%
Trinity Capital
DORM128.090.78
+0.61%
Dorman Products
K80.00N/A
N/A
Kellanova
ACTU6.59-0.15
-2.23%
Actuate Therapeutics Inc
ABP0.19N/A
-2.49%
Abpro Holdings Inc

EMCG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMCG and HAIUF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMCG and HAIUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMCG
1D Price
Change %
EMCG100%
N/A
HAIUF - EMCG
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSSUF - EMCG
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALCY - EMCG
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMCGU - EMCG
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSSAF - EMCG
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More