EMCG
Price
$12.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 16, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
82.69M
MLACU
Price
$10.40
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 16, 04:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMCG vs MLACU

Header iconEMCG vs MLACU Comparison
Open Charts EMCG vs MLACUBanner chart's image
Embrace Change Acquisition
Price$12.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization82.69M
Mountain Lake Acquisition
Price$10.40
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
EMCG vs MLACU Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMCG vs. MLACU commentary
Jun 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMCG is a StrongBuy and MLACU is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 17, 2025
Stock price -- (EMCG: $12.10 vs. MLACU: $10.37)
Brand notoriety: EMCG and MLACU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMCG: 16% vs. MLACU: 13%
Market capitalization -- EMCG: $82.69M vs. MLACU: $0
EMCG [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $82.69M. MLACU’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMCG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMLACU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EMCG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MLACU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EMCG is a better buy in the long-term than MLACU.

Price Growth

EMCG (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MLACU (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.23% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMCG YTD gains are higher at: 3.596 vs. MLACU (3.390). EMCG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -603.1K vs. MLACU (-1.84M). EMCG has more cash in the bank: 287K vs. MLACU (108K). EMCG (0) and MLACU (0) have equivalent revenues.
EMCGMLACUEMCG / MLACU
Capitalization82.7MN/A-
EBITDA-603.1K-1.84M33%
Gain YTD3.5963.390106%
P/E Ratio37.13N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash287K108K266%
Total DebtN/A3.38M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMCG: Fundamental Ratings
EMCG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
87
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
25

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QID28.040.72
+2.64%
ProShares UltraShort QQQ
BSMV20.54-0.03
-0.15%
Invesco BulletShares 2031 Muncpl Bd ETF
BUYW13.92-0.09
-0.64%
Main BuyWrite ETF
VNQI44.69-0.52
-1.15%
Vanguard Global ex-US Real Est ETF
HEAL10.58-0.19
-1.76%
Global X HealthTech ETF

EMCG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMCG and HAIUF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMCG and HAIUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMCG
1D Price
Change %
EMCG100%
N/A
HAIUF - EMCG
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSSUF - EMCG
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALCY - EMCG
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSSAF - EMCG
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLMIU - EMCG
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MLACU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MLACU and BEAG have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLACU and BEAG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLACU
1D Price
Change %
MLACU100%
N/A
BEAG - MLACU
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLMIU - MLACU
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRHC - MLACU
12%
Poorly correlated
-3.46%
HYAC - MLACU
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMCG - MLACU
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More