Advertisement
EMBVF vs KOF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMBVF is a Hold and KOF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EMBVF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- EMBVF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- KOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EMBVF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KOF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EMBVF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- KOF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
EMBVF (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +0.64% price change this week, while KOF (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +6.53% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +2.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.79%.
Reported Earning Dates
KOF is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+2.67% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
| EMBVF | KOF | EMBVF / KOF | |
| Capitalization | 18.6B | 21.3B | 87% |
| EBITDA | 50.5B | 41.4B | 122% |
| Gain YTD | 0.091 | 5.797 | 2% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.96 | 40.08 | 40% |
| Revenue | 251B | 290B | 87% |
| Total Cash | 32.6B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 66.6B | N/A | - |
EMBVF | KOF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 26 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 21 Undervalued | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 13 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 53 | 51 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EMBVF's Valuation (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KOF (97) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that EMBVF’s stock grew significantly faster than KOF’s over the last 12 months.
KOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as EMBVF (29) in the null industry. This means that KOF’s stock grew similarly to EMBVF’s over the last 12 months.
KOF's SMR Rating (51) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as EMBVF (53) in the null industry. This means that KOF’s stock grew similarly to EMBVF’s over the last 12 months.
KOF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as EMBVF (48) in the null industry. This means that KOF’s stock grew similarly to EMBVF’s over the last 12 months.
EMBVF's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KOF (92) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that EMBVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KOF’s over the last 12 months.
| EMBVF | KOF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 45% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 38% | 15 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 47% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 61% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DAPP | 20.08 | 0.39 | +1.98% |
| VanEck Digital Trfmt ETF | |||
| HTRB | 34.26 | 0.04 | +0.12% |
| Hartford Total Return Bond ETF | |||
| PMIO | 51.23 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| PGIM Municipal Income Opportunities ETF | |||
| VAMO | 35.26 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| Cambria Value and Momentum ETF | |||
| KPRO | 28.75 | -0.13 | -0.46% |
| KraneShares 100% KWEB Dfnd OutcmJan27ETF | |||
EMBVF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EMBVF and KOF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMBVF and KOF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMBVF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMBVF | 100% | N/A | ||
| KOF - EMBVF | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.95% | ||
| NTEI - EMBVF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| JSDA - EMBVF | 7% Poorly correlated | -2.79% | ||
| FQVTF - EMBVF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| YKLTY - EMBVF | 2% Poorly correlated | +8.62% | ||
More | ||||
KOF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that KOF and CCEP have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KOF and CCEP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KOF | 100% | +0.95% | ||
| CCEP - KOF | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.80% | ||
| MNST - KOF | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.20% | ||
| KO - KOF | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.05% | ||
| EMBVF - KOF | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KDP - KOF | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
More | ||||