EMBVF
Price
$10.51
Change
+$0.05 (+0.48%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
17.33B
FQVTF
Price
$12.70
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.01B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMBVF vs FQVTF

Header iconEMBVF vs FQVTF Comparison
Open Charts EMBVF vs FQVTFBanner chart's image
Arca Continental SAB de CV
Price$10.51
Change+$0.05 (+0.48%)
Volume$265
Capitalization17.33B
Fevertree Drinks
Price$12.70
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$961
Capitalization2.01B
EMBVF vs FQVTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EMBVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FQVTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMBVF vs. FQVTF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMBVF is a Buy and FQVTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (EMBVF: $10.51 vs. FQVTF: $12.70)
Brand notoriety: EMBVF and FQVTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMBVF: 12% vs. FQVTF: 13%
Market capitalization -- EMBVF: $17.33B vs. FQVTF: $2.01B
EMBVF [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $17.33B. FQVTF’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $2.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $263.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $24.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMBVF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFQVTF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EMBVF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FQVTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EMBVF is a better buy in the long-term than FQVTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMBVF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FQVTF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMBVF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FQVTF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EMBVF is a better buy in the short-term than FQVTF.

Price Growth

EMBVF (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -0.28% price change this week, while FQVTF (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +1.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +3.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.51%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+3.20% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMBVF($17.3B) has a higher market cap than FQVTF($2.01B). FQVTF has higher P/E ratio than EMBVF: FQVTF (65.79) vs EMBVF (14.75). FQVTF YTD gains are higher at: 49.588 vs. EMBVF (27.394). EMBVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 40.7B vs. FQVTF (52.7M). EMBVF has more cash in the bank: 27.9B vs. FQVTF (100M). FQVTF has less debt than EMBVF: FQVTF (2.7M) vs EMBVF (47.8B). EMBVF has higher revenues than FQVTF: EMBVF (215B) vs FQVTF (330M).
EMBVFFQVTFEMBVF / FQVTF
Capitalization17.3B2.01B860%
EBITDA40.7B52.7M77,230%
Gain YTD27.39449.58855%
P/E Ratio14.7565.7922%
Revenue215B330M65,152%
Total Cash27.9B100M27,900%
Total Debt47.8B2.7M1,770,370%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMBVF vs FQVTF: Fundamental Ratings
EMBVF
FQVTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
20100
SMR RATING
1..100
5154
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5242
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6694
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EMBVF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is in the same range as FQVTF (52). This means that EMBVF’s stock grew similarly to FQVTF’s over the last 12 months.

EMBVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FQVTF (100). This means that EMBVF’s stock grew significantly faster than FQVTF’s over the last 12 months.

EMBVF's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as FQVTF (54). This means that EMBVF’s stock grew similarly to FQVTF’s over the last 12 months.

FQVTF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as EMBVF (52). This means that FQVTF’s stock grew similarly to EMBVF’s over the last 12 months.

EMBVF's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as FQVTF (94). This means that EMBVF’s stock grew similarly to FQVTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMBVFFQVTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
45%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMBVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FQVTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JWEL2.700.10
+3.85%
Jowell Global Ltd
RILY3.280.05
+1.55%
B. Riley Financial
MNMD7.170.09
+1.27%
Mind Medicine (MindMed)
BATRK46.650.28
+0.60%
Atlanta Braves Holdings
SQM37.15-0.29
-0.77%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA

EMBVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMBVF and NTEI have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMBVF and NTEI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMBVF
1D Price
Change %
EMBVF100%
+0.48%
NTEI - EMBVF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JSDA - EMBVF
8%
Poorly correlated
+7.30%
FQVTF - EMBVF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YKLTY - EMBVF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.49%
MOJO - EMBVF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+19.54%
More

FQVTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FQVTF and SHOT have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FQVTF and SHOT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FQVTF
1D Price
Change %
FQVTF100%
N/A
SHOT - FQVTF
11%
Poorly correlated
-8.69%
UPCHY - FQVTF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMBVF - FQVTF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
MOJO - FQVTF
3%
Poorly correlated
+19.54%
LSDAF - FQVTF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More