EMBVF
Price
$10.26
Change
-$0.10 (-0.97%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
17.39B
FQVTF
Price
$11.87
Change
-$0.53 (-4.27%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.35B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMBVF vs FQVTF

Header iconEMBVF vs FQVTF Comparison
Open Charts EMBVF vs FQVTFBanner chart's image
Arca Continental SAB de CV
Price$10.26
Change-$0.10 (-0.97%)
Volume$427
Capitalization17.39B
Fevertree Drinks
Price$11.87
Change-$0.53 (-4.27%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.35B
EMBVF vs FQVTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EMBVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FQVTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMBVF vs. FQVTF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMBVF is a Hold and FQVTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (EMBVF: $10.26 vs. FQVTF: $11.87)
Brand notoriety: EMBVF and FQVTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMBVF: 3% vs. FQVTF: 1%
Market capitalization -- EMBVF: $17.39B vs. FQVTF: $1.35B
EMBVF [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $17.39B. FQVTF’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $1.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $282.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $20.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMBVF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFQVTF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EMBVF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FQVTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EMBVF is a better buy in the long-term than FQVTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMBVF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FQVTF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMBVF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FQVTF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EMBVF is a better buy in the short-term than FQVTF.

Price Growth

EMBVF (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +0.25% price change this week, while FQVTF (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was -1.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -1.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.99%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-1.38% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMBVF($17.4B) has a higher market cap than FQVTF($1.35B). FQVTF has higher P/E ratio than EMBVF: FQVTF (41.65) vs EMBVF (14.97). FQVTF YTD gains are higher at: 39.764 vs. EMBVF (24.315).
EMBVFFQVTFEMBVF / FQVTF
Capitalization17.4B1.35B1,287%
EBITDA50BN/A-
Gain YTD24.31539.76461%
P/E Ratio14.9741.6536%
Revenue251BN/A-
Total Cash26.9BN/A-
Total Debt60.2BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMBVF vs FQVTF: Fundamental Ratings
EMBVF
FQVTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
32100
SMR RATING
1..100
5254
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5851
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6044
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EMBVF's Valuation (22) in the null industry is in the same range as FQVTF (50). This means that EMBVF’s stock grew similarly to FQVTF’s over the last 12 months.

EMBVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FQVTF (100). This means that EMBVF’s stock grew significantly faster than FQVTF’s over the last 12 months.

EMBVF's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as FQVTF (54). This means that EMBVF’s stock grew similarly to FQVTF’s over the last 12 months.

FQVTF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as EMBVF (58). This means that FQVTF’s stock grew similarly to EMBVF’s over the last 12 months.

FQVTF's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as EMBVF (60). This means that FQVTF’s stock grew similarly to EMBVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMBVFFQVTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
35%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMBVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FQVTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GGOCX22.240.20
+0.91%
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Growth C
IYSCX12.690.11
+0.87%
Macquarie Smid Cap Core Fund Class C
NEIAX59.310.35
+0.59%
Columbia Large Cap Index A
TWCUX102.650.34
+0.33%
American Century Ultra® Inv
SGZFX64.330.07
+0.11%
Saturna Growth Z

EMBVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMBVF and NTEI have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMBVF and NTEI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMBVF
1D Price
Change %
EMBVF100%
-1.04%
NTEI - EMBVF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JSDA - EMBVF
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
FQVTF - EMBVF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YKLTY - EMBVF
1%
Poorly correlated
+10.35%
MOJO - EMBVF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+11.67%
More

FQVTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FQVTF and SHOT have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FQVTF and SHOT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FQVTF
1D Price
Change %
FQVTF100%
N/A
SHOT - FQVTF
11%
Poorly correlated
+12.24%
UPCHY - FQVTF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMBVF - FQVTF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
MOJO - FQVTF
3%
Poorly correlated
+11.67%
LSDAF - FQVTF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More