Advertisement
EMBC vs PHCCF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMBC is a StrongBuy and PHCCF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EMBC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePHCCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- EMBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PHCCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EMBC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHCCF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EMBC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PHCCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
EMBC (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +2.55% price change this week, while PHCCF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.00%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.68%.
Reported Earning Dates
EMBC is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-0.63% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
@Medical/Nursing Services (+1.01% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| EMBC | PHCCF | EMBC / PHCCF | |
| Capitalization | 715M | 906M | 79% |
| EBITDA | 284M | 50.9B | 1% |
| Gain YTD | -39.414 | 12.898 | -306% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.46 | 24.21 | 31% |
| Revenue | 1.08B | 361B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 226M | 36.9B | 1% |
| Total Debt | 1.43B | 248B | 1% |
| EMBC | PHCCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 50% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 25% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 12% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 7% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 77% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 83% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 33% |
Advertisement
EMBC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMBC has been loosely correlated with AZTA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMBC jumps, then AZTA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMBC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMBC | 100% | +1.34% | ||
| AZTA - EMBC | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.55% | ||
| XRAY - EMBC | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.26% | ||
| WAT - EMBC | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| MTD - EMBC | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| BLFS - EMBC | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.20% | ||
More | ||||
PHCCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHCCF has been loosely correlated with DIZTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHCCF jumps, then DIZTF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PHCCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHCCF | 100% | N/A | ||
| DIZTF - PHCCF | 62% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| NXGL - PHCCF | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.92% | ||
| TDVXF - PHCCF | 18% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TIVC - PHCCF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EMBC - PHCCF | 2% Poorly correlated | +1.34% | ||
More | ||||