Advertisement
EMBC vs INFU
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMBC is a Hold and INFU is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EMBC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileINFU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- EMBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- INFU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EMBC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INFU’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EMBC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
- INFU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
EMBC (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +4.90% price change this week, while INFU (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -2.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.04%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -2.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.02%.
Reported Earning Dates
EMBC is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.
INFU is expected to report earnings on Mar 18, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-1.44% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
@Medical/Nursing Services (-2.76% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| EMBC | INFU | EMBC / INFU | |
| Capitalization | 646M | 169M | 382% |
| EBITDA | 284M | 24.2M | 1,174% |
| Gain YTD | -8.165 | -7.581 | 108% |
| P/E Ratio | 6.73 | 31.88 | 21% |
| Revenue | 1.08B | 141M | 766% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 955K | - |
| Total Debt | 1.43B | 24.7M | 5,789% |
INFU | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 71 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| EMBC | INFU | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 14 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 82% | 7 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 77% |
Advertisement
EMBC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMBC has been loosely correlated with WAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMBC jumps, then WAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMBC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMBC | 100% | -0.27% | ||
| WAT - EMBC | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| MTD - EMBC | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.13% | ||
| RVTY - EMBC | 36% Loosely correlated | -5.57% | ||
| INFU - EMBC | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| A - EMBC | 35% Loosely correlated | -2.40% | ||
More | ||||
INFU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INFU has been loosely correlated with VREX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INFU jumps, then VREX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INFU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INFU | 100% | +0.61% | ||
| VREX - INFU | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| NVST - INFU | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.50% | ||
| EMBC - INFU | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| TMCI - INFU | 34% Loosely correlated | -7.52% | ||
| BLFS - INFU | 34% Loosely correlated | +2.28% | ||
More | ||||