EMAUF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
3.24M
ZMPLF
Price
$7.79
Change
-$0.50 (-6.03%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.89B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMAUF vs ZMPLF

Header iconEMAUF vs ZMPLF Comparison
Open Charts EMAUF vs ZMPLFBanner chart's image
EMPEROR METALS
Price$0.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$42.49K
Capitalization3.24M
Zimplats Holdings
Price$7.79
Change-$0.50 (-6.03%)
Volume$1.33K
Capitalization1.89B
EMAUF vs ZMPLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EMAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZMPLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMAUF vs. ZMPLF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMAUF is a Hold and ZMPLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (EMAUF: $0.14 vs. ZMPLF: $7.79)
Brand notoriety: EMAUF and ZMPLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMAUF: 22% vs. ZMPLF: 155%
Market capitalization -- EMAUF: $3.24M vs. ZMPLF: $1.89B
EMAUF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.24M. ZMPLF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMAUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZMPLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EMAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ZMPLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZMPLF is a better buy in the long-term than EMAUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMAUF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZMPLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMAUF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • ZMPLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ZMPLF is a better buy in the short-term than EMAUF.

Price Growth

EMAUF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -1.42% price change this week, while ZMPLF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZMPLF($1.89B) has a higher market cap than EMAUF($3.24M). EMAUF YTD gains are higher at: 176.342 vs. ZMPLF (-14.583). ZMPLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 660M vs. EMAUF (-1.06M). ZMPLF has more cash in the bank: 378M vs. EMAUF (2.37M). ZMPLF has higher revenues than EMAUF: ZMPLF (1.2B) vs EMAUF (0).
EMAUFZMPLFEMAUF / ZMPLF
Capitalization3.24M1.89B0%
EBITDA-1.06M660M-0%
Gain YTD176.342-14.583-1,209%
P/E RatioN/A5.38-
Revenue01.2B-
Total Cash2.37M378M1%
Total DebtN/A734K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ZMPLF: Fundamental Ratings
ZMPLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
82
SMR RATING
1..100
89
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
28
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMAUFZMPLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZMPLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CAMP1.590.10
+6.71%
Camp4 Therapeutics Corp
FET20.110.61
+3.13%
Forum Energy Technologies
SMFG15.20-0.03
-0.20%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group
TRUP56.00-0.24
-0.43%
Trupanion
MMS69.99-1.38
-1.93%
MAXIMUS

EMAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMAUF and VITFF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMAUF and VITFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMAUF
1D Price
Change %
EMAUF100%
+1.09%
VITFF - EMAUF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZMPLF - EMAUF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDLNF - EMAUF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSUPF - EMAUF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
MFGCF - EMAUF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ZMPLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ZMPLF and NPTLF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ZMPLF and NPTLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZMPLF
1D Price
Change %
ZMPLF100%
N/A
NPTLF - ZMPLF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMAUF - ZMPLF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.09%
CYPMF - ZMPLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVGAF - ZMPLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-50.00%
RDEXF - ZMPLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.95%
More