EMAUF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
QDROF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

EMAUF vs QDROF

Header iconEMAUF vs QDROF Comparison
Open Charts EMAUF vs QDROFBanner chart's image
EMPEROR METALS
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$88.35K
CapitalizationN/A
Quadro Resources
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6.67K
CapitalizationN/A
EMAUF vs QDROF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMAUF vs. QDROF commentary
Nov 16, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMAUF is a Hold and QDROF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 16, 2024
Stock price -- (EMAUF: $0.06 vs. QDROF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: EMAUF and QDROF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMAUF: 94% vs. QDROF: 37%
Market capitalization -- EMAUF: $3.24M vs. QDROF: $614.48K
EMAUF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.24M. QDROF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $614.48K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMAUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQDROF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EMAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QDROF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, QDROF is a better buy in the long-term than EMAUF.

Price Growth

EMAUF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -2.19% price change this week, while QDROF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -4.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-4.57% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMAUF($3.24M) has a higher market cap than QDROF($614K). QDROF YTD gains are higher at: 26.518 vs. EMAUF (-17.143). QDROF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -97.77K vs. EMAUF (-1.06M). EMAUF has more cash in the bank: 2.37M vs. QDROF (709K). EMAUF (0) and QDROF (0) have equivalent revenues.
EMAUFQDROFEMAUF / QDROF
Capitalization3.24M614K528%
EBITDA-1.06M-97.77K1,087%
Gain YTD-17.14326.518-65%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash2.37M709K335%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

EMAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMAUF and VITFF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMAUF and VITFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMAUF
1D Price
Change %
EMAUF100%
N/A
VITFF - EMAUF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZMPLF - EMAUF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDLNF - EMAUF
24%
Poorly correlated
+8.61%
NSUPF - EMAUF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.81%
MFGCF - EMAUF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
More

QDROF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QDROF and AMQFF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QDROF and AMQFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QDROF
1D Price
Change %
QDROF100%
N/A
AMQFF - QDROF
29%
Poorly correlated
+9.20%
MSLVF - QDROF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACDXF - QDROF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMAUF - QDROF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EXNRF - QDROF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.27%
More