EMAUF
Price
$0.16
Change
-$0.01 (-5.88%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
23.3M
NESRF
Price
$15.04
Change
+$0.09 (+0.60%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
21.81B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMAUF vs NESRF

Header iconEMAUF vs NESRF Comparison
Open Charts EMAUF vs NESRFBanner chart's image
EMPEROR METALS
Price$0.16
Change-$0.01 (-5.88%)
Volume$594.94K
Capitalization23.3M
Northern Star Resources
Price$15.04
Change+$0.09 (+0.60%)
Volume$11.5K
Capitalization21.81B
EMAUF vs NESRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EMAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NESRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMAUF vs. NESRF commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMAUF is a Hold and NESRF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (EMAUF: $0.16 vs. NESRF: $15.04)
Brand notoriety: EMAUF and NESRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMAUF: 177% vs. NESRF: 66%
Market capitalization -- EMAUF: $23.3M vs. NESRF: $21.81B
EMAUF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $23.3M. NESRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $21.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $97.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMAUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNESRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EMAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NESRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NESRF is a better buy in the long-term than EMAUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMAUF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NESRF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMAUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NESRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NESRF is a better buy in the short-term than EMAUF.

Price Growth

EMAUF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -9.72% price change this week, while NESRF (@Precious Metals) price change was +8.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +30.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6063.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.35% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NESRF($21.8B) has a higher market cap than EMAUF($23.3M). EMAUF YTD gains are higher at: 221.272 vs. NESRF (51.919). NESRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.44B vs. EMAUF (-1.95M). NESRF has more cash in the bank: 1.69B vs. EMAUF (1.37M). EMAUF has less debt than NESRF: EMAUF (59.7K) vs NESRF (1.71B). NESRF has higher revenues than EMAUF: NESRF (6.42B) vs EMAUF (0).
EMAUFNESRFEMAUF / NESRF
Capitalization23.3M21.8B0%
EBITDA-1.95M3.44B-0%
Gain YTD221.27251.919426%
P/E RatioN/A20.45-
Revenue06.42B-
Total Cash1.37M1.69B0%
Total Debt59.7K1.71B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NESRF: Fundamental Ratings
NESRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
80
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
60
SMR RATING
1..100
89
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
84
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMAUFNESRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NESRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SBAC198.820.82
+0.41%
SBA Communications Corp
AMRK27.04-0.06
-0.22%
A-Mark Precious Metals
MPW4.96-0.05
-1.00%
Medical Properties Trust
OLB1.28-0.02
-1.54%
OLB Group Inc. (The)
BSET15.40-0.67
-4.17%
Bassett Furniture Industries

EMAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMAUF and BDLNF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMAUF and BDLNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMAUF
1D Price
Change %
EMAUF100%
-3.81%
BDLNF - EMAUF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSUPF - EMAUF
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.92%
MFGCF - EMAUF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.97%
NESRF - EMAUF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
ENDGF - EMAUF
20%
Poorly correlated
+11.05%
More

NESRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NESRF has been loosely correlated with LOMLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NESRF jumps, then LOMLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NESRF
1D Price
Change %
NESRF100%
+0.60%
LOMLF - NESRF
35%
Loosely correlated
-4.27%
NSUPF - NESRF
29%
Poorly correlated
-4.92%
WDOFF - NESRF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.70%
RIOFF - NESRF
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.83%
PMNXF - NESRF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
More