Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMAAX vs HMEAX
EMAAX vs HMEAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMAAX vs. HMEAX commentary
Feb 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMAAX is a StrongBuy and HMEAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HMEAX has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. EMAAX (56.9M). HMEAX pays higher dividends than EMAAX: HMEAX (4.79) vs EMAAX (1.13). EMAAX was incepted earlier than HMEAX: EMAAX (25 years) vs HMEAX (9 years). HMEAX (2.45) is less costly to investors than EMAAX (1.87). HMEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 406.00 vs. EMAAX (100.00). EMAAX (6%) and HMEAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. EMAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMEAX: EMAAX (1000) vs HMEAX (2500). EMAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.01 vs. HMEAX (4.98). HMEAX return over 5 years is better than : 20.57 vs. EMAAX (16.39).
| EMAAX | HMEAX | EMAAX / HMEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 2.25 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 2.45 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.957 | -0.154 | -2,576% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 56.9M | 1.29B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 4.79 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.01 | 4.98 | 381% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.81 | 15.96 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.39 | 20.57 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.17 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement