EMA
Price
$46.80
Change
-$0.24 (-0.51%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
14.06B
62 days until earnings call
HRNNF
Price
$36.12
Change
+$0.15 (+0.42%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
21.74B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMA vs HRNNF

Header iconEMA vs HRNNF Comparison
Open Charts EMA vs HRNNFBanner chart's image
Emera
Price$46.80
Change-$0.24 (-0.51%)
Volume$82.27K
Capitalization14.06B
Hydro One
Price$36.12
Change+$0.15 (+0.42%)
Volume$21.49K
Capitalization21.74B
EMA vs HRNNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HRNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMA vs. HRNNF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMA is a StrongBuy and HRNNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (EMA: $46.80 vs. HRNNF: $36.12)
Brand notoriety: EMA and HRNNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMA: 69% vs. HRNNF: 97%
Market capitalization -- EMA: $14.06B vs. HRNNF: $21.74B
EMA [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $14.06B. HRNNF’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $21.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $146B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $21.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHRNNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EMA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HRNNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EMA is a better buy in the long-term than HRNNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HRNNF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HRNNF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HRNNF is a better buy in the short-term than EMA.

Price Growth

EMA (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -1.93% price change this week, while HRNNF (@Electric Utilities) price change was -0.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

EMA is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (-0.14% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HRNNF($21.7B) has a higher market cap than EMA($14.1B). HRNNF has higher P/E ratio than EMA: HRNNF (23.84) vs EMA (21.88). EMA YTD gains are higher at: 25.201 vs. HRNNF (18.159). EMA (3.08B) and HRNNF (3.05B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . EMA has more cash in the bank: 200M vs. HRNNF (71M). HRNNF has less debt than EMA: HRNNF (18.1B) vs EMA (20.2B). HRNNF has higher revenues than EMA: HRNNF (8.76B) vs EMA (8.23B).
EMAHRNNFEMA / HRNNF
Capitalization14.1B21.7B65%
EBITDA3.08B3.05B101%
Gain YTD25.20118.159139%
P/E Ratio21.8823.8492%
Revenue8.23B8.76B94%
Total Cash200M71M282%
Total Debt20.2B18.1B112%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMA vs HRNNF: Fundamental Ratings
EMA
HRNNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5991
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7613
SMR RATING
1..100
7869
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5055
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3756
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EMA's Valuation (43) in the null industry is in the same range as HRNNF (74). This means that EMA’s stock grew similarly to HRNNF’s over the last 12 months.

HRNNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EMA (76). This means that HRNNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EMA’s over the last 12 months.

HRNNF's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as EMA (78). This means that HRNNF’s stock grew similarly to EMA’s over the last 12 months.

EMA's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as HRNNF (55). This means that EMA’s stock grew similarly to HRNNF’s over the last 12 months.

EMA's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as HRNNF (56). This means that EMA’s stock grew similarly to HRNNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMAHRNNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
46%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HRNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BWIN31.850.57
+1.82%
The Baldwin Insurance Group Inc.
CTNT1.680.01
+0.90%
Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service Inc
LECO244.320.34
+0.14%
Lincoln Electric Holdings
CODA7.96-0.04
-0.50%
Coda Octopus Group
PUMP4.77-0.17
-3.44%
ProPetro Holding Corp

EMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMA has been loosely correlated with FTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMA jumps, then FTS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMA
1D Price
Change %
EMA100%
-0.51%
FTS - EMA
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
DUK - EMA
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
HRNNF - EMA
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AEP - EMA
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
SO - EMA
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
More

HRNNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HRNNF and EMA have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HRNNF and EMA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HRNNF
1D Price
Change %
HRNNF100%
N/A
EMA - HRNNF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
HKVTY - HRNNF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IESFY - HRNNF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HPIFY - HRNNF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HKCVF - HRNNF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A