EMA
Price
$46.80
Change
-$0.24 (-0.51%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
14.06B
62 days until earnings call
FTS
Price
$49.23
Change
-$0.45 (-0.91%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
24.89B
48 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMA vs FTS

Header iconEMA vs FTS Comparison
Open Charts EMA vs FTSBanner chart's image
Emera
Price$46.80
Change-$0.24 (-0.51%)
Volume$82.27K
Capitalization14.06B
Fortis
Price$49.23
Change-$0.45 (-0.91%)
Volume$393.06K
Capitalization24.89B
EMA vs FTS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMA vs. FTS commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMA is a StrongBuy and FTS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (EMA: $46.80 vs. FTS: $49.23)
Brand notoriety: EMA and FTS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMA: 69% vs. FTS: 68%
Market capitalization -- EMA: $14.06B vs. FTS: $24.89B
EMA [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $14.06B. FTS’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $24.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $146B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $21.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFTS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EMA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EMA is a better buy in the long-term than FTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FTS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FTS is a better buy in the short-term than EMA.

Price Growth

EMA (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -1.93% price change this week, while FTS (@Electric Utilities) price change was -1.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

EMA is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2025.

FTS is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (-0.14% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTS($24.9B) has a higher market cap than EMA($14.1B). EMA has higher P/E ratio than FTS: EMA (21.88) vs FTS (19.97). EMA YTD gains are higher at: 25.201 vs. FTS (18.427). FTS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.78B vs. EMA (3.08B). FTS has more cash in the bank: 221M vs. EMA (200M). EMA has less debt than FTS: EMA (20.2B) vs FTS (33.8B). FTS has higher revenues than EMA: FTS (11.9B) vs EMA (8.23B).
EMAFTSEMA / FTS
Capitalization14.1B24.9B57%
EBITDA3.08B5.78B53%
Gain YTD25.20118.427137%
P/E Ratio21.8819.97110%
Revenue8.23B11.9B69%
Total Cash200M221M90%
Total Debt20.2B33.8B60%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMA vs FTS: Fundamental Ratings
EMA
FTS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5955
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7663
SMR RATING
1..100
7877
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5054
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3745
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EMA's Valuation (43) in the null industry is in the same range as FTS (59). This means that EMA’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.

FTS's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as EMA (76). This means that FTS’s stock grew similarly to EMA’s over the last 12 months.

FTS's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as EMA (78). This means that FTS’s stock grew similarly to EMA’s over the last 12 months.

EMA's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as FTS (54). This means that EMA’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.

EMA's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as FTS (45). This means that EMA’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMAFTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
39%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSTY15.620.36
+2.36%
YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
MAMB23.640.13
+0.55%
Monarch Ambassador Income ETF
ONEZ25.970.01
+0.06%
TrueShares Seasonality Laddered Buf ETF
BOIL29.90-1.00
-3.24%
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas
TTT70.46-3.29
-4.46%
ProShares UltraPro Short 20+ Year Trs

EMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMA has been loosely correlated with FTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMA jumps, then FTS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMA
1D Price
Change %
EMA100%
-0.51%
FTS - EMA
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
DUK - EMA
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
HRNNF - EMA
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AEP - EMA
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
SO - EMA
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
More

FTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTS has been loosely correlated with DUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTS jumps, then DUK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTS
1D Price
Change %
FTS100%
-0.91%
DUK - FTS
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
NWE - FTS
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
SO - FTS
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
ED - FTS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
AEP - FTS
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
More