EMA
Price
$48.85
Change
+$0.22 (+0.45%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
14.66B
35 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FTS
Price
$51.69
Change
-$0.24 (-0.46%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
26.23B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMA vs FTS

Header iconEMA vs FTS Comparison
Open Charts EMA vs FTSBanner chart's image
Emera
Price$48.85
Change+$0.22 (+0.45%)
Volume$2.96K
Capitalization14.66B
Fortis
Price$51.69
Change-$0.24 (-0.46%)
Volume$14.77K
Capitalization26.23B
EMA vs FTS Comparison Chart in %
EMA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMA vs. FTS commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMA is a Hold and FTS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (EMA: $48.63 vs. FTS: $51.93)
Brand notoriety: EMA and FTS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMA: 189% vs. FTS: 105%
Market capitalization -- EMA: $14.66B vs. FTS: $26.23B
EMA [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $14.66B. FTS’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $26.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $170.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $23.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFTS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EMA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FTS is a better buy in the long-term than EMA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMA’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FTS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EMA is a better buy in the short-term than FTS.

Price Growth

EMA (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -0.45% price change this week, while FTS (@Electric Utilities) price change was +1.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

EMA is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

FTS is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (+0.61% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTS($26.2B) has a higher market cap than EMA($14.7B). FTS has higher P/E ratio than EMA: FTS (21.46) vs EMA (18.51). FTS YTD gains are higher at: -0.019 vs. EMA (-1.239). FTS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.86B vs. EMA (3.37B). FTS has more cash in the bank: 389M vs. EMA (212M). EMA has less debt than FTS: EMA (20.6B) vs FTS (34.4B). FTS has higher revenues than EMA: FTS (12B) vs EMA (8.53B).
EMAFTSEMA / FTS
Capitalization14.7B26.2B56%
EBITDA3.37B5.86B58%
Gain YTD-1.239-0.0196,436%
P/E Ratio18.5121.4686%
Revenue8.53B12B71%
Total Cash212M389M54%
Total Debt20.6B34.4B60%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMA vs FTS: Fundamental Ratings
EMA
FTS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7958
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7860
SMR RATING
1..100
7377
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5151
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7731
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
950

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EMA's Valuation (41) in the null industry is in the same range as FTS (59). This means that EMA’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.

FTS's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as EMA (78). This means that FTS’s stock grew similarly to EMA’s over the last 12 months.

EMA's SMR Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as FTS (77). This means that EMA’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.

EMA's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as FTS (51). This means that EMA’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.

FTS's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EMA (77). This means that FTS’s stock grew somewhat faster than EMA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMAFTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
39%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BUFY22.580.04
+0.18%
FT Vest Laddered Intl Mod Buffr ETF
BSCT18.880.02
+0.11%
Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corp Bd ETF
EMCB66.85-0.13
-0.19%
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corp Bd ETF
EWQ45.87-0.09
-0.20%
iShares MSCI France ETF
VCLN26.56-0.29
-1.06%
Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF

EMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMA has been loosely correlated with DUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMA jumps, then DUK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMA
1D Price
Change %
EMA100%
+1.35%
DUK - EMA
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
ED - EMA
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.26%
SO - EMA
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
EXC - EMA
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
LNT - EMA
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
More

FTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTS has been closely correlated with EMA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTS jumps, then EMA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTS
1D Price
Change %
FTS100%
+1.15%
EMA - FTS
69%
Closely correlated
+1.35%
DUK - FTS
68%
Closely correlated
+1.10%
NGG - FTS
68%
Closely correlated
+1.02%
ED - FTS
67%
Closely correlated
+1.26%
SO - FTS
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
More