EMA
Price
$48.42
Change
+$0.77 (+1.62%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
14.57B
97 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
EQUEY
Price
$7.10
Change
+$0.65 (+10.08%)
Updated
Nov 5 closing price
Capitalization
9.35B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMA vs EQUEY

Header iconEMA vs EQUEY Comparison
Open Charts EMA vs EQUEYBanner chart's image
Emera
Price$48.42
Change+$0.77 (+1.62%)
Volume$228.84K
Capitalization14.57B
Equatorial Energia S.A
Price$7.10
Change+$0.65 (+10.08%)
Volume$132
Capitalization9.35B
EMA vs EQUEY Comparison Chart in %
EMA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EQUEY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMA vs. EQUEY commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMA is a Hold and EQUEY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (EMA: $47.65 vs. EQUEY: $7.10)
Brand notoriety: EMA and EQUEY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMA: 161% vs. EQUEY: 19%
Market capitalization -- EMA: $14.57B vs. EQUEY: $9.35B
EMA [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $14.57B. EQUEY’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $9.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $174.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $23.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEQUEY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EMA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EQUEY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EMA and EQUEY are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EQUEY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • EQUEY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EQUEY is a better buy in the short-term than EMA.

Price Growth

EMA (@Electric Utilities) experienced а +0.23% price change this week, while EQUEY (@Electric Utilities) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +6.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

EMA is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (+6.16% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMA($14.6B) has a higher market cap than EQUEY($9.35B). EMA has higher P/E ratio than EQUEY: EMA (18.60) vs EQUEY (14.53). EQUEY YTD gains are higher at: 80.194 vs. EMA (27.475). EQUEY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.7B vs. EMA (3.08B). EQUEY has more cash in the bank: 9.41B vs. EMA (200M). EMA has less debt than EQUEY: EMA (20.2B) vs EQUEY (55.2B). EQUEY has higher revenues than EMA: EQUEY (46.9B) vs EMA (8.23B).
EMAEQUEYEMA / EQUEY
Capitalization14.6B9.35B156%
EBITDA3.08B12.7B24%
Gain YTD27.47580.19434%
P/E Ratio18.6014.53128%
Revenue8.23B46.9B18%
Total Cash200M9.41B2%
Total Debt20.2B55.2B37%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMA vs EQUEY: Fundamental Ratings
EMA
EQUEY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6029
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8038
SMR RATING
1..100
7755
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5145
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5073
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EMA's Valuation (37) in the null industry is in the same range as EQUEY (69). This means that EMA’s stock grew similarly to EQUEY’s over the last 12 months.

EQUEY's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EMA (80). This means that EQUEY’s stock grew somewhat faster than EMA’s over the last 12 months.

EQUEY's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as EMA (77). This means that EQUEY’s stock grew similarly to EMA’s over the last 12 months.

EQUEY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as EMA (51). This means that EQUEY’s stock grew similarly to EMA’s over the last 12 months.

EMA's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as EQUEY (73). This means that EMA’s stock grew similarly to EQUEY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMAEQUEY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EQUEY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SNPD26.800.36
+1.37%
Xtrackers S&P Div Arstcrts Scrn ETF
SIXD28.660.01
+0.04%
AllianzIM US Lrg Cp 6M Bfr10 Jun/Dec ETF
IBTF23.31N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Tr ETF
PBTP26.17-0.03
-0.13%
Invesco 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF
CAF16.39-0.28
-1.68%
Morgan Stanley China A Share Fund

EMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMA has been loosely correlated with DUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMA jumps, then DUK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMA
1D Price
Change %
EMA100%
+0.17%
DUK - EMA
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
SO - EMA
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
ED - EMA
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
AEP - EMA
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
DTE - EMA
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
More

EQUEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EQUEY and ELP have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EQUEY and ELP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQUEY
1D Price
Change %
EQUEY100%
N/A
ELP - EQUEY
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
MAEOY - EQUEY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMA - EQUEY
-2%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
ELEZY - EQUEY
-10%
Poorly correlated
+2.28%
EUSP - EQUEY
-13%
Poorly correlated
N/A