EMA
Price
$46.72
Change
+$0.07 (+0.15%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
10.95B
12 days until earnings call
ENAKF
Price
$18.37
Change
-$1.45 (-7.32%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
33.1B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMA vs ENAKF

Header iconEMA vs ENAKF Comparison
Open Charts EMA vs ENAKFBanner chart's image
Emera
Price$46.72
Change+$0.07 (+0.15%)
Volume$38.67K
Capitalization10.95B
E.ON SE
Price$18.37
Change-$1.45 (-7.32%)
Volume$632
Capitalization33.1B
EMA vs ENAKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ENAKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMA vs. ENAKF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMA is a StrongBuy and ENAKF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (EMA: $46.72 vs. ENAKF: $18.37)
Brand notoriety: EMA and ENAKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMA: 35% vs. ENAKF: 4%
Market capitalization -- EMA: $10.95B vs. ENAKF: $33.1B
EMA [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $10.95B. ENAKF’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $33.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $131.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $18.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileENAKF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EMA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ENAKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ENAKF is a better buy in the long-term than EMA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ENAKF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ENAKF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EMA is a better buy in the short-term than ENAKF.

Price Growth

EMA (@Electric Utilities) experienced а +2.32% price change this week, while ENAKF (@Electric Utilities) price change was -4.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +1.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

EMA is expected to report earnings on Aug 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (+1.21% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ENAKF($33.1B) has a higher market cap than EMA($11B). ENAKF has higher P/E ratio than EMA: ENAKF (35.84) vs EMA (12.44). ENAKF YTD gains are higher at: 57.682 vs. EMA (24.987). ENAKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.44B vs. EMA (3.22B). ENAKF has more cash in the bank: 8.54B vs. EMA (280M). EMA has less debt than ENAKF: EMA (19.3B) vs ENAKF (31.9B). ENAKF has higher revenues than EMA: ENAKF (120B) vs EMA (8.01B).
EMAENAKFEMA / ENAKF
Capitalization11B33.1B33%
EBITDA3.22B5.44B59%
Gain YTD24.98757.68243%
P/E Ratio12.4435.8435%
Revenue8.01B120B7%
Total Cash280M8.54B3%
Total Debt19.3B31.9B61%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMA vs ENAKF: Fundamental Ratings
EMA
ENAKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
550
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6837
SMR RATING
1..100
7836
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4744
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5697
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EMA's Valuation (38) in the null industry is in the same range as ENAKF (42). This means that EMA’s stock grew similarly to ENAKF’s over the last 12 months.

ENAKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as EMA (68). This means that ENAKF’s stock grew similarly to EMA’s over the last 12 months.

ENAKF's SMR Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EMA (78). This means that ENAKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EMA’s over the last 12 months.

ENAKF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as EMA (47). This means that ENAKF’s stock grew similarly to EMA’s over the last 12 months.

EMA's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ENAKF (97). This means that EMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than ENAKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMAENAKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
47%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ENAKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VKTX34.420.92
+2.75%
Viking Therapeutics
BIDU90.80-0.19
-0.21%
Baidu
ERII13.88-0.03
-0.22%
Energy Recovery
EPRX5.49-0.05
-0.90%
Eupraxia Pharmaceuticals
OCC4.98-0.11
-2.16%
Optical Cable Corp

EMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMA has been loosely correlated with FTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMA jumps, then FTS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMA
1D Price
Change %
EMA100%
+0.15%
FTS - EMA
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
ACLLF - EMA
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
DUK - EMA
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
EDPFY - EMA
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
HRNNF - EMA
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
More

ENAKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ENAKF and NGGTF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ENAKF and NGGTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ENAKF
1D Price
Change %
ENAKF100%
-7.32%
NGGTF - ENAKF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.24%
EMA - ENAKF
-3%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
ESOCF - ENAKF
-4%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
EUSP - ENAKF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EONGY - ENAKF
-6%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
More