EM
Price
$1.21
Change
+$0.01 (+0.83%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
306.85M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TCOM
Price
$72.24
Change
-$0.24 (-0.33%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
47.35B
89 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EM vs TCOM

Header iconEM vs TCOM Comparison
Open Charts EM vs TCOMBanner chart's image
Smart Share Global
Price$1.21
Change+$0.01 (+0.83%)
Volume$324.78K
Capitalization306.85M
Trip.com Group
Price$72.24
Change-$0.24 (-0.33%)
Volume$789.9K
Capitalization47.35B
EM vs TCOM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EM vs. TCOM commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EM is a Hold and TCOM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (EM: $1.21 vs. TCOM: $72.24)
Brand notoriety: EM: Not notable vs. TCOM: Notable
EM represents the Personnel Services, while TCOM is part of the Consumer Sundries industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EM: 43% vs. TCOM: 46%
Market capitalization -- EM: $306.85M vs. TCOM: $47.35B
EM [@Personnel Services] is valued at $306.85M. TCOM’s [@Consumer Sundries] market capitalization is $47.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $29.19B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $175.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.73B. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $18.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTCOM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TCOM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TCOM is a better buy in the long-term than EM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TCOM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TCOM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TCOM is a better buy in the short-term than EM.

Price Growth

EM (@Personnel Services) experienced а -9.02% price change this week, while TCOM (@Consumer Sundries) price change was +0.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was -0.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.80%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +2.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

TCOM is expected to report earnings on Mar 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Personnel Services (-0.87% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

@Consumer Sundries (+2.79% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TCOM($47.4B) has a higher market cap than EM($307M). EM has higher P/E ratio than TCOM: EM (64.39) vs TCOM (19.61). EM YTD gains are higher at: 68.056 vs. TCOM (5.725). TCOM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 21.2B vs. EM (101M). TCOM has more cash in the bank: 80.5B vs. EM (3.04B). EM has less debt than TCOM: EM (10.6M) vs TCOM (31.9B). TCOM has higher revenues than EM: TCOM (57.3B) vs EM (1.96B).
EMTCOMEM / TCOM
Capitalization307M47.4B1%
EBITDA101M21.2B0%
Gain YTD68.0565.7251,189%
P/E Ratio64.3919.61328%
Revenue1.96B57.3B3%
Total Cash3.04B80.5B4%
Total Debt10.6M31.9B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TCOM: Fundamental Ratings
TCOM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
19
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
35
SMR RATING
1..100
60
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
78
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMTCOM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TCOM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PREIF0.10N/A
+4.58%
Precipitate Gold Corp
GIFOF8.81N/A
N/A
Grifols Sa
CGIUF2.49N/A
N/A
ESR REIT
MPNGY26.47-0.06
-0.23%
MEITUAN
ARRNF0.24-0.01
-4.20%
American Rare Earths Ltd.

EM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EM and TCOM have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EM and TCOM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EM
1D Price
Change %
EM100%
+0.83%
TCOM - EM
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
BFAM - EM
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
CCL - EM
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
LIND - EM
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
SABR - EM
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.37%
More

TCOM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TCOM has been loosely correlated with VIK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TCOM jumps, then VIK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TCOM
1D Price
Change %
TCOM100%
-0.33%
VIK - TCOM
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
ABNB - TCOM
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
PRSU - TCOM
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
CUK - TCOM
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.92%
TNL - TCOM
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
More