Advertisement
ELV vs XHS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELV is a Hold and XHS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ELV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
- ELV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ELV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- ELV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ELV (@Managed Health Care) experienced а +4.33% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was +3.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -20.22%.
Reported Earning Dates
ELV is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Managed Health Care (+3.16% weekly)Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.
ELV | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 84 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ELV | XHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 55% | 5 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 55% | 10 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 80% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ERN.X | 0.878819 | 0.014142 | +1.64% |
| Ethos Reserve Note cryptocurrency | |||
| THETA.X | 0.887671 | 0.003918 | +0.44% |
| Theta Network cryptocurrency | |||
| RIF.X | 0.061715 | -0.000059 | -0.10% |
| Rootstock Infrastructure Framework cryptocurrency | |||
| PSG.X | 1.594822 | -0.008733 | -0.54% |
| Paris Saint-Germain Fan Token cryptocurrency | |||
| RPL.X | 6.748167 | -0.166824 | -2.41% |
| Rocket Pool cryptocurrency | |||
ELV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ELV has been closely correlated with MOH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ELV jumps, then MOH could also see price increases.
XHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XHS has been loosely correlated with PRVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XHS jumps, then PRVA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XHS | 100% | +0.46% | ||
| PRVA - XHS | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| PNTG - XHS | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| EHC - XHS | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| ELV - XHS | 51% Loosely correlated | +3.09% | ||
| BTSG - XHS | 51% Loosely correlated | -3.62% | ||
More | ||||