ELST
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.01 (-4.76%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
FKWL
Price
$4.37
Change
-$0.03 (-0.68%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
5 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ELST vs FKWL

Header iconELST vs FKWL Comparison
Open Charts ELST vs FKWLBanner chart's image
Electronic Systems Technology
Price$0.20
Change-$0.01 (-4.76%)
Volume$510
CapitalizationN/A
Franklin Wireless
Price$4.37
Change-$0.03 (-0.68%)
Volume$1.68K
CapitalizationN/A
ELST vs FKWL Comparison Chart
Loading...
FKWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ELST vs. FKWL commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELST is a Hold and FKWL is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (ELST: $0.20 vs. FKWL: $4.37)
Brand notoriety: ELST and FKWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Telecommunications Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ELST: 12% vs. FKWL: 16%
Market capitalization -- ELST: $1.48M vs. FKWL: $35.23M
ELST [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $1.48M. FKWL’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $35.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $202.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $4.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ELST’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFKWL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ELST’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FKWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FKWL is a better buy in the long-term than ELST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FKWL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FKWL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

ELST (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а +0.99% price change this week, while FKWL (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was +4.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was -0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

ELST is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2023.

FKWL is expected to report earnings on Nov 20, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (-0.79% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKWL($35.2M) has a higher market cap than ELST($1.48M). FKWL has higher P/E ratio than ELST: FKWL (24.15) vs ELST (12.09). FKWL YTD gains are higher at: 28.985 vs. ELST (-35.737). ELST has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 61.4K vs. FKWL (-1.17M). FKWL has more cash in the bank: 32.7M vs. ELST (782K). FKWL has less debt than ELST: FKWL (0) vs ELST (50.9K). FKWL has higher revenues than ELST: FKWL (47.4M) vs ELST (1.91M).
ELSTFKWLELST / FKWL
Capitalization1.48M35.2M4%
EBITDA61.4K-1.17M-5%
Gain YTD-35.73728.985-123%
P/E Ratio12.0924.1550%
Revenue1.91M47.4M4%
Total Cash782K32.7M2%
Total Debt50.9K0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ELST vs FKWL: Fundamental Ratings
ELST
FKWL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8726
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10087
SMR RATING
1..100
9492
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8042
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
844
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ELST's Valuation (42) in the null industry is in the same range as FKWL (54). This means that ELST’s stock grew similarly to FKWL’s over the last 12 months.

FKWL's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as ELST (100). This means that FKWL’s stock grew similarly to ELST’s over the last 12 months.

FKWL's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as ELST (94). This means that FKWL’s stock grew similarly to ELST’s over the last 12 months.

FKWL's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ELST (80). This means that FKWL’s stock grew somewhat faster than ELST’s over the last 12 months.

FKWL's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ELST (84). This means that FKWL’s stock grew significantly faster than ELST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FKWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FKWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

ELST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ELST has been loosely correlated with SONM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ELST jumps, then SONM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELST
1D Price
Change %
ELST100%
-2.38%
SONM - ELST
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.45%
ETCMY - ELST
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FKWL - ELST
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
ETCIA - ELST
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CYSNF - ELST
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FKWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FKWL and CSCO have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FKWL and CSCO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FKWL
1D Price
Change %
FKWL100%
-0.62%
CSCO - FKWL
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.13%
AIRG - FKWL
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.93%
CYSNF - FKWL
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIOT - FKWL
14%
Poorly correlated
-3.36%
TSAT - FKWL
10%
Poorly correlated
+4.68%
More