ELS
Price
$59.53
Change
-$0.45 (-0.75%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
11.54B
21 days until earnings call
UMH
Price
$14.72
Change
+$0.03 (+0.20%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.25B
35 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ELS vs UMH

Header iconELS vs UMH Comparison
Open Charts ELS vs UMHBanner chart's image
Equity Lifestyle Properties
Price$59.53
Change-$0.45 (-0.75%)
Volume$1.84M
Capitalization11.54B
UMH Properties
Price$14.72
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
Volume$826.59K
Capitalization1.25B
ELS vs UMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ELS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UMH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ELS vs. UMH commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELS is a Buy and UMH is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (ELS: $59.53 vs. UMH: $14.72)
Brand notoriety: ELS and UMH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Media Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ELS: 105% vs. UMH: 133%
Market capitalization -- ELS: $11.54B vs. UMH: $1.25B
ELS [@Media Conglomerates] is valued at $11.54B. UMH’s [@Media Conglomerates] market capitalization is $1.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Media Conglomerates] industry ranges from $27.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Media Conglomerates] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ELS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUMH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ELS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UMH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ELS is a better buy in the long-term than UMH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ELS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ELS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • UMH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UMH is a better buy in the short-term than ELS.

Price Growth

ELS (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а -0.85% price change this week, while UMH (@Media Conglomerates) price change was -0.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

ELS is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2025.

UMH is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Media Conglomerates (-1.53% weekly)

Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ELS($11.5B) has a higher market cap than UMH($1.25B). UMH has higher P/E ratio than ELS: UMH (105.14) vs ELS (30.69). ELS YTD gains are higher at: -8.376 vs. UMH (-18.905). UMH has more cash in the bank: 109M vs. ELS (9.91M). UMH has less debt than ELS: UMH (659M) vs ELS (3.25B).
ELSUMHELS / UMH
Capitalization11.5B1.25B920%
EBITDAN/A119M-
Gain YTD-8.376-18.90544%
P/E Ratio30.69105.1429%
RevenueN/A250M-
Total Cash9.91M109M9%
Total Debt3.25B659M493%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ELS vs UMH: Fundamental Ratings
ELS
UMH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8455
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9377
SMR RATING
1..100
4090
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6183
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6982
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UMH's Valuation (14) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ELS (76). This means that UMH’s stock grew somewhat faster than ELS’s over the last 12 months.

UMH's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as ELS (93). This means that UMH’s stock grew similarly to ELS’s over the last 12 months.

ELS's SMR Rating (40) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UMH (90). This means that ELS’s stock grew somewhat faster than UMH’s over the last 12 months.

ELS's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as UMH (83). This means that ELS’s stock grew similarly to UMH’s over the last 12 months.

ELS's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as UMH (82). This means that ELS’s stock grew similarly to UMH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ELSUMH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ELS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UMH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UBVVX86.070.94
+1.10%
Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Val R5
LLGLX14.550.14
+0.97%
Longleaf Partners Global
GCSVX9.610.08
+0.84%
Geneva SMID Cap Growth Institutional
IVFLX4.360.03
+0.69%
Federated Hermes Intl Strat Val Div R6
VMNVX34.100.21
+0.62%
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Admr

ELS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ELS has been closely correlated with SUI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ELS jumps, then SUI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELS
1D Price
Change %
ELS100%
+0.11%
SUI - ELS
71%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
UMH - ELS
68%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
CUBE - ELS
66%
Loosely correlated
+2.01%
ADC - ELS
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
AMH - ELS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
More

UMH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMH has been closely correlated with UDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMH jumps, then UDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UMH
1D Price
Change %
UMH100%
+0.20%
UDR - UMH
72%
Closely correlated
+1.28%
IRT - UMH
70%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
NXRT - UMH
68%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
CPT - UMH
68%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
ELS - UMH
68%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
More