ELS
Price
$60.68
Change
+$0.39 (+0.65%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
11.76B
64 days until earnings call
UMH
Price
$15.97
Change
-$0.26 (-1.60%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.36B
80 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ELS vs UMH

Header iconELS vs UMH Comparison
Open Charts ELS vs UMHBanner chart's image
Equity Lifestyle Properties
Price$60.68
Change+$0.39 (+0.65%)
Volume$1.23M
Capitalization11.76B
UMH Properties
Price$15.97
Change-$0.26 (-1.60%)
Volume$1.1M
Capitalization1.36B
ELS vs UMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ELS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UMH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ELS vs. UMH commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELS is a Hold and UMH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (ELS: $60.68 vs. UMH: $15.97)
Brand notoriety: ELS and UMH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Media Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ELS: 75% vs. UMH: 234%
Market capitalization -- ELS: $11.76B vs. UMH: $1.36B
ELS [@Media Conglomerates] is valued at $11.76B. UMH’s [@Media Conglomerates] market capitalization is $1.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Media Conglomerates] industry ranges from $27.14B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Media Conglomerates] industry is $5.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ELS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUMH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ELS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UMH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UMH is a better buy in the long-term than ELS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ELS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ELS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UMH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ELS is a better buy in the short-term than UMH.

Price Growth

ELS (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а +0.88% price change this week, while UMH (@Media Conglomerates) price change was -0.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

ELS is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2025.

UMH is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Media Conglomerates (-0.15% weekly)

Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ELS($11.8B) has a higher market cap than UMH($1.36B). UMH has higher P/E ratio than ELS: UMH (114.07) vs ELS (31.28). ELS YTD gains are higher at: -7.408 vs. UMH (-12.019). UMH has less debt than ELS: UMH (606M) vs ELS (3.25B).
ELSUMHELS / UMH
Capitalization11.8B1.36B870%
EBITDA727MN/A-
Gain YTD-7.408-12.01962%
P/E Ratio31.28114.0727%
Revenue1.43BN/A-
Total Cash9.91MN/A-
Total Debt3.25B606M536%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ELS vs UMH: Fundamental Ratings
ELS
UMH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
753
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8159
SMR RATING
1..100
4190
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7576
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7179
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UMH's Valuation (16) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ELS (76). This means that UMH’s stock grew somewhat faster than ELS’s over the last 12 months.

UMH's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as ELS (81). This means that UMH’s stock grew similarly to ELS’s over the last 12 months.

ELS's SMR Rating (41) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UMH (90). This means that ELS’s stock grew somewhat faster than UMH’s over the last 12 months.

ELS's Price Growth Rating (75) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as UMH (76). This means that ELS’s stock grew similarly to UMH’s over the last 12 months.

ELS's P/E Growth Rating (71) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as UMH (79). This means that ELS’s stock grew similarly to UMH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ELSUMH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ELS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UMH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AVNM68.160.26
+0.38%
Avantis All International Mkts Eq ETF
LCLG59.66N/A
N/A
Logan Capital Broad Innovative Gr ETF
TXSS26.40N/A
N/A
Texas Capital Texas Sm Cp Eq Idx ETF
DFGP54.74-0.11
-0.21%
Dimensional Global Core Pls Fxd Inc ETF
OCTU27.06-0.10
-0.36%
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 UncOctETF

ELS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ELS has been closely correlated with SUI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ELS jumps, then SUI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELS
1D Price
Change %
ELS100%
+0.65%
SUI - ELS
71%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
UMH - ELS
67%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
CUBE - ELS
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
ADC - ELS
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
AMH - ELS
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
More

UMH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMH has been closely correlated with UDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMH jumps, then UDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UMH
1D Price
Change %
UMH100%
-0.22%
UDR - UMH
73%
Closely correlated
+1.16%
IRT - UMH
70%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
CPT - UMH
68%
Closely correlated
+0.75%
VRE - UMH
68%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
ELS - UMH
67%
Closely correlated
+0.65%
More