Advertisement
ELS vs UMH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELS is a Hold and UMH is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ELS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUMH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- ELS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- UMH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ELS’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ELS’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
- UMH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
ELS (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а +3.40% price change this week, while UMH (@Media Conglomerates) price change was +0.82% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was +0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.66%.
Reported Earning Dates
ELS is expected to report earnings on Feb 02, 2026.
UMH is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Media Conglomerates (+0.73% weekly)Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.
| ELS | UMH | ELS / UMH | |
| Capitalization | 12B | 1.37B | 877% |
| EBITDA | 739M | 119M | 621% |
| Gain YTD | 1.815 | 0.880 | 206% |
| P/E Ratio | 30.86 | 200.63 | 15% |
| Revenue | 1.44B | 257M | 560% |
| Total Cash | 13.2M | 65.8M | 20% |
| Total Debt | 3.28B | 673M | 487% |
ELS | UMH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 74 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 48 Fair valued | 32 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 78 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 40 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 17 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UMH's Valuation (32) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as ELS (48). This means that UMH’s stock grew similarly to ELS’s over the last 12 months.
UMH's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as ELS (79). This means that UMH’s stock grew similarly to ELS’s over the last 12 months.
ELS's SMR Rating (40) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UMH (89). This means that ELS’s stock grew somewhat faster than UMH’s over the last 12 months.
UMH's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as ELS (59). This means that UMH’s stock grew similarly to ELS’s over the last 12 months.
UMH's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ELS (62). This means that UMH’s stock grew somewhat faster than ELS’s over the last 12 months.
| ELS | UMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 18 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 48% | 3 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 66% |
Advertisement
ELS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ELS has been closely correlated with SUI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ELS jumps, then SUI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ELS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELS | 100% | +1.16% | ||
| SUI - ELS | 77% Closely correlated | +1.52% | ||
| CUBE - ELS | 66% Loosely correlated | +2.57% | ||
| AMH - ELS | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.42% | ||
| FCPT - ELS | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| UMH - ELS | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.07% | ||
More | ||||
UMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMH has been closely correlated with UDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMH jumps, then UDR could also see price increases.