ELRRF
Price
$1.99
Change
+$0.06 (+3.11%)
Updated
Feb 6 closing price
Capitalization
210.75M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
STBMF
Price
$0.45
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 6 closing price
Capitalization
531.26M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ELRRF vs STBMF

Header iconELRRF vs STBMF Comparison
Open Charts ELRRF vs STBMFBanner chart's image
Eloro Resources
Price$1.99
Change+$0.06 (+3.11%)
Volume$25.73K
Capitalization210.75M
St. Barbara
Price$0.45
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$76.8K
Capitalization531.26M
ELRRF vs STBMF Comparison Chart in %
ELRRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STBMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ELRRF vs. STBMF commentary
Feb 09, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELRRF is a Hold and STBMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 09, 2026
Stock price -- (ELRRF: $1.99 vs. STBMF: $0.45)
Brand notoriety: ELRRF and STBMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ELRRF: 20% vs. STBMF: 418%
Market capitalization -- ELRRF: $210.75M vs. STBMF: $531.26M
ELRRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $210.75M. STBMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $531.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $140.39B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ELRRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTBMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ELRRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • STBMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ELRRF and STBMF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ELRRF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STBMF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ELRRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • STBMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ELRRF is a better buy in the short-term than STBMF.

Price Growth

ELRRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -3.40% price change this week, while STBMF (@Precious Metals) price change was -9.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +165.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +91.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+165.92% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STBMF($531M) has a higher market cap than ELRRF($211M). STBMF YTD gains are higher at: 5.023 vs. ELRRF (-1.970).
ELRRFSTBMFELRRF / STBMF
Capitalization211M531M40%
EBITDA-7.12MN/A-
Gain YTD-1.9705.023-39%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash13.2MN/A-
Total Debt64.1KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ELRRF vs STBMF: Fundamental Ratings
ELRRF
STBMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8897
SMR RATING
1..100
9595
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3635
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ELRRF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as STBMF (50). This means that ELRRF’s stock grew similarly to STBMF’s over the last 12 months.

ELRRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as STBMF (97). This means that ELRRF’s stock grew similarly to STBMF’s over the last 12 months.

ELRRF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as STBMF (95). This means that ELRRF’s stock grew similarly to STBMF’s over the last 12 months.

STBMF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as ELRRF (36). This means that STBMF’s stock grew similarly to ELRRF’s over the last 12 months.

STBMF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ELRRF (100). This means that STBMF’s stock grew similarly to ELRRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ELRRFSTBMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ELRRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STBMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WSTAX60.322.03
+3.48%
Nomura Science and Technology A
LICTX19.670.55
+2.88%
Lord Abbett International Equity R5
TNXIX21.240.47
+2.26%
1290 Avantis U.S. Large Cap Growth I
AEYGX36.080.69
+1.95%
American Century Equity Growth R5
NUGIX35.360.66
+1.90%
Nuveen Global Dividend Growth I

ELRRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ELRRF has been loosely correlated with CDE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ELRRF jumps, then CDE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELRRF
1D Price
Change %
ELRRF100%
+3.33%
CDE - ELRRF
41%
Loosely correlated
+12.19%
WPM - ELRRF
40%
Loosely correlated
+3.88%
RGLD - ELRRF
38%
Loosely correlated
+4.79%
PAAS - ELRRF
38%
Loosely correlated
+5.34%
AEM - ELRRF
37%
Loosely correlated
+3.77%
More

STBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STBMF has been loosely correlated with GLBKF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STBMF jumps, then GLBKF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STBMF
1D Price
Change %
STBMF100%
+0.36%
GLBKF - STBMF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GSISF - STBMF
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.49%
TDRRF - STBMF
28%
Poorly correlated
+11.73%
KSSRF - STBMF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELRRF - STBMF
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.33%
More