ELRRF
Price
$2.25
Change
+$0.12 (+5.63%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
243.08M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
STBMF
Price
$0.38
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 12 closing price
Capitalization
452.71M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ELRRF vs STBMF

Header iconELRRF vs STBMF Comparison
Open Charts ELRRF vs STBMFBanner chart's image
Eloro Resources
Price$2.25
Change+$0.12 (+5.63%)
Volume$58.17K
Capitalization243.08M
St. Barbara
Price$0.38
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$143
Capitalization452.71M
ELRRF vs STBMF Comparison Chart in %
ELRRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STBMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ELRRF vs. STBMF commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELRRF is a Hold and STBMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (ELRRF: $2.25 vs. STBMF: $0.38)
Brand notoriety: ELRRF and STBMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ELRRF: 53% vs. STBMF: 4%
Market capitalization -- ELRRF: $243.08M vs. STBMF: $452.71M
ELRRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $243.08M. STBMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $452.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $143.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ELRRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTBMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ELRRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • STBMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, STBMF is a better buy in the long-term than ELRRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ELRRF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STBMF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ELRRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • STBMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STBMF is a better buy in the short-term than ELRRF.

Price Growth

ELRRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +7.49% price change this week, while STBMF (@Precious Metals) price change was -10.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +23.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +101.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.04% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STBMF($453M) has a higher market cap than ELRRF($243M). ELRRF YTD gains are higher at: 11.010 vs. STBMF (-10.791).
ELRRFSTBMFELRRF / STBMF
Capitalization243M453M54%
EBITDA-7.12MN/A-
Gain YTD11.010-10.791-102%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash13.2MN/A-
Total Debt64.1KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ELRRF vs STBMF: Fundamental Ratings
ELRRF
STBMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7595
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
81100
SMR RATING
1..100
9595
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3538
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10097
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STBMF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ELRRF (66). This means that STBMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ELRRF’s over the last 12 months.

ELRRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as STBMF (100). This means that ELRRF’s stock grew similarly to STBMF’s over the last 12 months.

ELRRF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as STBMF (95). This means that ELRRF’s stock grew similarly to STBMF’s over the last 12 months.

ELRRF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as STBMF (38). This means that ELRRF’s stock grew similarly to STBMF’s over the last 12 months.

STBMF's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as ELRRF (100). This means that STBMF’s stock grew similarly to ELRRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ELRRFSTBMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ELRRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STBMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRWBX25.710.13
+0.51%
MFS Blended Research Growth Eq B
TGVCX48.540.13
+0.27%
Touchstone Dynamic Large Cap Growth C
QFVIX29.430.07
+0.24%
Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Instl
JIEZX22.280.05
+0.22%
JPMorgan International Equity R2
CCMMX9.25N/A
N/A
Conestoga Mid Cap Investors

ELRRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ELRRF has been loosely correlated with CDE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ELRRF jumps, then CDE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELRRF
1D Price
Change %
ELRRF100%
+5.80%
CDE - ELRRF
41%
Loosely correlated
+2.22%
WPM - ELRRF
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.77%
RGLD - ELRRF
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.95%
PAAS - ELRRF
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
AEM - ELRRF
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.59%
More

STBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STBMF has been loosely correlated with GLBKF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STBMF jumps, then GLBKF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STBMF
1D Price
Change %
STBMF100%
N/A
GLBKF - STBMF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GSISF - STBMF
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.13%
TDRRF - STBMF
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.44%
KSSRF - STBMF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELRRF - STBMF
26%
Poorly correlated
+5.80%
More