ELRNF
Price
$2.38
Change
+$0.25 (+11.74%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
96.62M
JFHHF
Price
$1.73
Change
-$0.07 (-3.89%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
812.69M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ELRNF vs JFHHF

Header iconELRNF vs JFHHF Comparison
Open Charts ELRNF vs JFHHFBanner chart's image
Elron Ventures
Price$2.38
Change+$0.25 (+11.74%)
Volume$2.6K
Capitalization96.62M
Jupiter Fund Management
Price$1.73
Change-$0.07 (-3.89%)
Volume$100
Capitalization812.69M
ELRNF vs JFHHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ELRNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JFHHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ELRNF vs. JFHHF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELRNF is a Hold and JFHHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (ELRNF: $2.38 vs. JFHHF: $1.73)
Brand notoriety: ELRNF and JFHHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ELRNF: 104% vs. JFHHF: 3%
Market capitalization -- ELRNF: $96.62M vs. JFHHF: $812.69M
ELRNF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $96.62M. JFHHF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $812.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ELRNF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileJFHHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ELRNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • JFHHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ELRNF is a better buy in the long-term than JFHHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ELRNF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JFHHF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ELRNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • JFHHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JFHHF is a better buy in the short-term than ELRNF.

Price Growth

ELRNF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +12.00% price change this week, while JFHHF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.80%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.28% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JFHHF($813M) has a higher market cap than ELRNF($96.6M). JFHHF has higher P/E ratio than ELRNF: JFHHF (11.92) vs ELRNF (6.26). ELRNF YTD gains are higher at: 209.938 vs. JFHHF (66.667). JFHHF has more cash in the bank: 413M vs. ELRNF (7.92M). JFHHF has less debt than ELRNF: JFHHF (0) vs ELRNF (10.3M).
ELRNFJFHHFELRNF / JFHHF
Capitalization96.6M813M12%
EBITDAN/A89.1M-
Gain YTD209.93866.667315%
P/E Ratio6.2611.9253%
RevenueN/A381M-
Total Cash7.92M413M2%
Total Debt10.3M0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ELRNF: Fundamental Ratings
ELRNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
46
SMR RATING
1..100
45
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ELRNFJFHHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
43%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ELRNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JFHHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EIPTX14.830.12
+0.82%
UBS Engage For Impact P2
VLEIX64.750.06
+0.09%
Value Line Small Cap Opportunities Instl
SDGAX132.77-0.05
-0.04%
DWS Capital Growth A
PJOQX23.32-0.13
-0.55%
PGIM Jennison Focused Value R6
FGIKX70.14-0.51
-0.72%
Fidelity Growth & Income K

ELRNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ELRNF and JFHHF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ELRNF and JFHHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELRNF
1D Price
Change %
ELRNF100%
+11.74%
JFHHF - ELRNF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBXIB - ELRNF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JTCPF - ELRNF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBXIA - ELRNF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QUCT - ELRNF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

JFHHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JFHHF has been loosely correlated with FNCSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JFHHF jumps, then FNCSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JFHHF
1D Price
Change %
JFHHF100%
N/A
FNCSF - JFHHF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.94%
ELRNF - JFHHF
28%
Poorly correlated
+11.74%
GBLBF - JFHHF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STEP - JFHHF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
WNMLA - JFHHF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More