ELPQF
Price
$4.90
Change
-$0.11 (-2.20%)
Updated
Aug 20 closing price
Capitalization
7.36B
M
Price
$18.00
Change
+$0.92 (+5.39%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
4.83B
47 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ELPQF vs M

Header iconELPQF vs M Comparison
Open Charts ELPQF vs MBanner chart's image
El Puerto de Liverpool S.A. de C.V
Price$4.90
Change-$0.11 (-2.20%)
Volume$200
Capitalization7.36B
Macy's
Price$18.00
Change+$0.92 (+5.39%)
Volume$13.71M
Capitalization4.83B
ELPQF vs M Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ELPQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ELPQF vs. M commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELPQF is a Hold and M is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (ELPQF: $4.90 vs. M: $18.00)
Brand notoriety: ELPQF: Not notable vs. M: Notable
Both companies represent the Department Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ELPQF: 127% vs. M: 144%
Market capitalization -- ELPQF: $7.36B vs. M: $4.83B
ELPQF [@Department Stores] is valued at $7.36B. M’s [@Department Stores] market capitalization is $4.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Department Stores] industry ranges from $12.34T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Department Stores] industry is $5.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ELPQF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ELPQF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • M’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, M is a better buy in the long-term than ELPQF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ELPQF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while M’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ELPQF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • M’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ELPQF is a better buy in the short-term than M.

Price Growth

ELPQF (@Department Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while M (@Department Stores) price change was +2.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Department Stores industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

M is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Department Stores (+0.01% weekly)

A department store sells a wide variety of consumer goods under different “departments,” including (but not necessarily limited to) apparel, household appliances, home furnishings, personal care products, cosmetics, consumer electronics. During healthy macroeconomic conditions, consumers typically won’t shy away from big-ticket purchases; but during a downturn, consumer spending might get limited to the most necessary/daily essentials. Several department stores purchase items on bulk from manufacturers for resale to consumers at a profit. Some of the largest department stores companies in the U.S. include Kohl’s Corporation, Macy’s Inc., and Ollie’s Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ELPQF($7.36B) has a higher market cap than M($4.83B). M has higher P/E ratio than ELPQF: M (10.23) vs ELPQF (6.15). M YTD gains are higher at: 10.629 vs. ELPQF (-0.679). M has less debt than ELPQF: M (5.66B) vs ELPQF (56.6B).
ELPQFMELPQF / M
Capitalization7.36B4.83B152%
EBITDA37.9BN/A-
Gain YTD-0.67910.629-6%
P/E Ratio6.1510.2360%
Revenue222BN/A-
Total Cash9.65BN/A-
Total Debt56.6B5.66B999%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ELPQF vs M: Fundamental Ratings
ELPQF
M
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4179
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6064
SMR RATING
1..100
6261
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6139
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6796
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
950

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ELPQF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as M (23) in the Department Stores industry. This means that ELPQF’s stock grew similarly to M’s over the last 12 months.

ELPQF's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as M (64) in the Department Stores industry. This means that ELPQF’s stock grew similarly to M’s over the last 12 months.

M's SMR Rating (61) in the Department Stores industry is in the same range as ELPQF (62) in the null industry. This means that M’s stock grew similarly to ELPQF’s over the last 12 months.

M's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Department Stores industry is in the same range as ELPQF (61) in the null industry. This means that M’s stock grew similarly to ELPQF’s over the last 12 months.

ELPQF's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the null industry is in the same range as M (96) in the Department Stores industry. This means that ELPQF’s stock grew similarly to M’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ELPQFM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ELPQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GRX9.010.05
+0.56%
Gabelli Healthcare & Wellness Trust (The)
FARX26.580.11
+0.41%
Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF
GYLD13.410.05
+0.35%
Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF
FDN281.440.81
+0.29%
First Trust Dow Jones Internet ETF
KORP47.560.02
+0.04%
American Century Dvrs Corp Bd ETF

ELPQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ELPQF and DDS have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ELPQF and DDS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELPQF
1D Price
Change %
ELPQF100%
N/A
DDS - ELPQF
12%
Poorly correlated
+2.12%
KSS - ELPQF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
CBDBY - ELPQF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.67%
M - ELPQF
2%
Poorly correlated
+5.39%
PPASF - ELPQF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

M and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, M has been loosely correlated with DDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if M jumps, then DDS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To M
1D Price
Change %
M100%
+5.39%
DDS - M
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.12%
KSS - M
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.12%
DDT - M
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
CBDBY - M
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.67%
AONNY - M
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.14%
More