ELMTF
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.01 (-7.14%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
82.58M
NWCCF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.01 (-6.67%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
25.81M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ELMTF vs NWCCF

Header iconELMTF vs NWCCF Comparison
Open Charts ELMTF vs NWCCFBanner chart's image
Element 25
Price$0.13
Change-$0.01 (-7.14%)
Volume$500
Capitalization82.58M
NORTHWEST COPPER
Price$0.14
Change-$0.01 (-6.67%)
Volume$500
Capitalization25.81M
ELMTF vs NWCCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ELMTF vs. NWCCF commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELMTF is a Hold and NWCCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (ELMTF: $0.13 vs. NWCCF: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: ELMTF and NWCCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ELMTF: 8% vs. NWCCF: 4%
Market capitalization -- ELMTF: $82.58M vs. NWCCF: $25.81M
ELMTF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $82.58M. NWCCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $25.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ELMTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNWCCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ELMTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NWCCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NWCCF is a better buy in the long-term than ELMTF.

Price Growth

ELMTF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +1.00% price change this week, while NWCCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -2.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +0.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.38%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+0.87% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ELMTF($82.6M) has a higher market cap than NWCCF($25.8M). ELMTF YTD gains are higher at: -17.937 vs. NWCCF (-26.792). NWCCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -655.21K vs. ELMTF (-15.58M). ELMTF has more cash in the bank: 7M vs. NWCCF (3.76M). ELMTF has higher revenues than NWCCF: ELMTF (26.8M) vs NWCCF (0).
ELMTFNWCCFELMTF / NWCCF
Capitalization82.6M25.8M320%
EBITDA-15.58M-655.21K2,377%
Gain YTD-17.937-26.79267%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue26.8M0-
Total Cash7M3.76M186%
Total DebtN/A112K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NWCCF: Fundamental Ratings
NWCCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
15
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYBCX57.57-0.43
-0.74%
Rydex Basic Materials C
FADAX22.24-0.28
-1.24%
Fidelity Advisor Dividend Growth A
PFGKX36.21-0.47
-1.28%
Victory Pioneer Fundamental Growth R6
HOOFX28.66-0.47
-1.61%
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps F
HFECX52.41-0.90
-1.69%
Janus Henderson European Focus C

ELMTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ELMTF has been loosely correlated with FRSPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ELMTF jumps, then FRSPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELMTF
1D Price
Change %
ELMTF100%
N/A
FRSPF - ELMTF
35%
Loosely correlated
+13.92%
LTRBF - ELMTF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCKRF - ELMTF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KNGRF - ELMTF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.93%
FNICF - ELMTF
22%
Poorly correlated
-12.39%
More

NWCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NWCCF and CHXMF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NWCCF and CHXMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWCCF
1D Price
Change %
NWCCF100%
N/A
CHXMF - NWCCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.90%
HUSIF - NWCCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
ELMTF - NWCCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMASF - NWCCF
16%
Poorly correlated
-11.60%
SLVDF - NWCCF
12%
Poorly correlated
+6.81%
More