ELMTF
Price
$0.15
Change
+$0.02 (+14.29%)
Updated
Jul 7 closing price
Capitalization
82.58M
FRSPF
Price
$0.30
Change
-$0.01 (-3.23%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
15.27M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ELMTF vs FRSPF

Header iconELMTF vs FRSPF Comparison
Open Charts ELMTF vs FRSPFBanner chart's image
Element 25
Price$0.15
Change+$0.02 (+14.29%)
Volume$50K
Capitalization82.58M
First Phosphate
Price$0.30
Change-$0.01 (-3.23%)
Volume$48.07K
Capitalization15.27M
ELMTF vs FRSPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ELMTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ELMTF vs. FRSPF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELMTF is a Hold and FRSPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (ELMTF: $0.16 vs. FRSPF: $0.30)
Brand notoriety: ELMTF and FRSPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ELMTF: 181% vs. FRSPF: 76%
Market capitalization -- ELMTF: $82.58M vs. FRSPF: $15.27M
ELMTF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $82.58M. FRSPF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $15.27M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ELMTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFRSPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ELMTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FRSPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ELMTF and FRSPF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ELMTF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRSPF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ELMTF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FRSPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRSPF is a better buy in the short-term than ELMTF.

Price Growth

ELMTF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FRSPF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -6.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.18% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ELMTF($82.6M) has a higher market cap than FRSPF($15.3M). FRSPF YTD gains are higher at: 71.429 vs. ELMTF (-3.125). FRSPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.07M vs. ELMTF (-15.58M). ELMTF has higher revenues than FRSPF: ELMTF (26.8M) vs FRSPF (0).
ELMTFFRSPFELMTF / FRSPF
Capitalization82.6M15.3M540%
EBITDA-15.58M-1.07M1,453%
Gain YTD-3.12571.429-4%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue26.8M0-
Total Cash7MN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ELMTFFRSPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ELMTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GUER1.020.08
+8.51%
Guerrilla RF, Inc.
CMHHF1.74N/A
N/A
China Merchants Port Holdings Company Limited
RHUHF26.98N/A
N/A
Richelieu Hardware Ltd.
VMCAF12.40N/A
N/A
Valuence Merger Corp I
TOYOF19.12-0.15
-0.80%
Toyota Motor Corp.

ELMTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ELMTF has been loosely correlated with FRSPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ELMTF jumps, then FRSPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELMTF
1D Price
Change %
ELMTF100%
N/A
FRSPF - ELMTF
35%
Loosely correlated
-4.72%
LTRBF - ELMTF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCKRF - ELMTF
26%
Poorly correlated
-7.37%
KNGRF - ELMTF
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.41%
FNICF - ELMTF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
More

FRSPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRSPF has been loosely correlated with ELMTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRSPF jumps, then ELMTF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRSPF
1D Price
Change %
FRSPF100%
-4.72%
ELMTF - FRSPF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CLRSF - FRSPF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRGXF - FRSPF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.76%
TIGCF - FRSPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.32%
LSANF - FRSPF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.74%
More