ELMTF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.01 (-6.67%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
82.58M
FNICF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
15.05M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ELMTF vs FNICF

Header iconELMTF vs FNICF Comparison
Open Charts ELMTF vs FNICFBanner chart's image
Element 25
Price$0.14
Change-$0.01 (-6.67%)
Volume$40K
Capitalization82.58M
Fathom Nickel
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$37.5K
Capitalization15.05M
ELMTF vs FNICF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ELMTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNICF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ELMTF vs. FNICF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELMTF is a Hold and FNICF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ELMTF: $0.14 vs. FNICF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: ELMTF and FNICF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ELMTF: 310% vs. FNICF: 49%
Market capitalization -- ELMTF: $82.58M vs. FNICF: $15.05M
ELMTF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $82.58M. FNICF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $15.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ELMTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFNICF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ELMTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FNICF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNICF is a better buy in the long-term than ELMTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ELMTF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNICF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ELMTF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FNICF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNICF is a better buy in the short-term than ELMTF.

Price Growth

ELMTF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -6.00% price change this week, while FNICF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -18.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ELMTF($82.6M) has a higher market cap than FNICF($15M). FNICF YTD gains are higher at: 40.306 vs. ELMTF (-11.875). FNICF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.76M vs. ELMTF (-15.58M). ELMTF has more cash in the bank: 7M vs. FNICF (524K). ELMTF has higher revenues than FNICF: ELMTF (26.8M) vs FNICF (0).
ELMTFFNICFELMTF / FNICF
Capitalization82.6M15M551%
EBITDA-15.58M-1.76M887%
Gain YTD-11.87540.306-29%
P/E RatioN/A2.37-
Revenue26.8M0-
Total Cash7M524K1,336%
Total DebtN/A258K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ELMTFFNICF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
86%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ELMTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNICF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LSRCY26.350.13
+0.50%
Lasertec Corp.
MAAL1.47N/A
N/A
Marketing Alliance, Inc. (The)
RLLWF2.36N/A
N/A
Reliance Worldwide Corp Ltd.
LSPKF0.24N/A
N/A
LIfeSpeak Inc.
TLGRF0.26-0.01
-5.02%
TALGA GROUP LTD.

ELMTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ELMTF has been loosely correlated with FRSPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ELMTF jumps, then FRSPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELMTF
1D Price
Change %
ELMTF100%
N/A
FRSPF - ELMTF
35%
Loosely correlated
+4.59%
LTRBF - ELMTF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCKRF - ELMTF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KNGRF - ELMTF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.88%
FNICF - ELMTF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FNICF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNICF and NRVTF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNICF and NRVTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNICF
1D Price
Change %
FNICF100%
N/A
NRVTF - FNICF
23%
Poorly correlated
+9.69%
ELMTF - FNICF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LEMIF - FNICF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.77%
SRKZF - FNICF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSNUF - FNICF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More