ELMA
Price
$22.15
Change
-$0.25 (-1.12%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
25.36M
PBFS
Price
$13.07
Change
-$0.10 (-0.76%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
330.77M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ELMA vs PBFS

Header iconELMA vs PBFS Comparison
Open Charts ELMA vs PBFSBanner chart's image
Elmer Ban
Price$22.15
Change-$0.25 (-1.12%)
Volume$445
Capitalization25.36M
Pioneer Ban
Price$13.07
Change-$0.10 (-0.76%)
Volume$19.37K
Capitalization330.77M
ELMA vs PBFS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ELMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ELMA vs. PBFS commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELMA is a StrongBuy and PBFS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (ELMA: $22.15 vs. PBFS: $13.07)
Brand notoriety: ELMA and PBFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ELMA: 50% vs. PBFS: 76%
Market capitalization -- ELMA: $25.36M vs. PBFS: $330.77M
ELMA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $25.36M. PBFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $330.77M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ELMA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePBFS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ELMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PBFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ELMA is a better buy in the long-term than PBFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ELMA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PBFS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ELMA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PBFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PBFS is a better buy in the short-term than ELMA.

Price Growth

ELMA (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.68% price change this week, while PBFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBFS($331M) has a higher market cap than ELMA($25.4M). PBFS has higher P/E ratio than ELMA: PBFS (18.15) vs ELMA (8.86). PBFS YTD gains are higher at: 13.455 vs. ELMA (1.163).
ELMAPBFSELMA / PBFS
Capitalization25.4M331M8%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.16313.4559%
P/E Ratio8.8618.1549%
RevenueN/A79.4M-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt675KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ELMA vs PBFS: Fundamental Ratings
ELMA
PBFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8773
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1649
SMR RATING
1..100
757
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5350
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5345
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a14

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ELMA's Valuation (43) in the null industry is in the same range as PBFS (74). This means that ELMA’s stock grew similarly to PBFS’s over the last 12 months.

ELMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PBFS (49). This means that ELMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than PBFS’s over the last 12 months.

ELMA's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PBFS (57). This means that ELMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than PBFS’s over the last 12 months.

PBFS's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as ELMA (53). This means that PBFS’s stock grew similarly to ELMA’s over the last 12 months.

PBFS's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as ELMA (53). This means that PBFS’s stock grew similarly to ELMA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ELMAPBFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
16%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ELMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SYZLF4.940.03
+0.65%
Sylogist Ltd.
TSIOF0.68N/A
N/A
361 Degrees International Limited
IMIUY29.74-0.40
-1.33%
IMI plc
VCISF135.01-2.99
-2.17%
Vinci SA
VPTDF0.08N/A
-4.16%
VentriPoint Diagnostics Ltd.

ELMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ELMA and PBFS have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ELMA and PBFS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELMA
1D Price
Change %
ELMA100%
-1.12%
PBFS - ELMA
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
KFFB - ELMA
22%
Poorly correlated
+7.76%
PGNN - ELMA
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPXXY - ELMA
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRST - ELMA
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
More

PBFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBFS has been loosely correlated with BLFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PBFS jumps, then BLFY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBFS
1D Price
Change %
PBFS100%
-0.76%
BLFY - PBFS
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.53%
BHRB - PBFS
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
GNTY - PBFS
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.29%
BCML - PBFS
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
PCB - PBFS
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.31%
More