ELEMF
Price
$0.81
Change
-$0.01 (-1.22%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
OGNRF
Price
$0.94
Change
+$0.01 (+1.08%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

ELEMF vs OGNRF

Header iconELEMF vs OGNRF Comparison
Open Charts ELEMF vs OGNRFBanner chart's image
ELEMENTAL ALTUS ROYALTIES
Price$0.81
Change-$0.01 (-1.22%)
Volume$92.5K
CapitalizationN/A
Orogen Royalties
Price$0.94
Change+$0.01 (+1.08%)
Volume$145.01K
CapitalizationN/A
ELEMF vs OGNRF Comparison Chart
Loading...
OGNRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ELEMF vs. OGNRF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELEMF is a Hold and OGNRF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (ELEMF: $0.81 vs. OGNRF: $0.94)
Brand notoriety: ELEMF and OGNRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ELEMF: 254% vs. OGNRF: 95%
Market capitalization -- ELEMF: $173.46M vs. OGNRF: $81.57M
ELEMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $173.46M. OGNRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $81.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ELEMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOGNRF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ELEMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OGNRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OGNRF is a better buy in the long-term than ELEMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OGNRF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • OGNRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

ELEMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -2.73% price change this week, while OGNRF (@Precious Metals) price change was -1.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -3.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-3.68% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ELEMF($173M) has a higher market cap than OGNRF($81.6M). OGNRF YTD gains are higher at: 92.002 vs. ELEMF (-2.145). OGNRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 335K vs. ELEMF (-8.42M). OGNRF has more cash in the bank: 15.9M vs. ELEMF (12.5M). OGNRF has less debt than ELEMF: OGNRF (223K) vs ELEMF (30.1M). ELEMF has higher revenues than OGNRF: ELEMF (10.2M) vs OGNRF (4.36M).
ELEMFOGNRFELEMF / OGNRF
Capitalization173M81.6M212%
EBITDA-8.42M335K-2,512%
Gain YTD-2.14592.002-2%
P/E RatioN/A108.70-
Revenue10.2M4.36M234%
Total Cash12.5M15.9M79%
Total Debt30.1M223K13,498%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ELEMF vs OGNRF: Fundamental Ratings
ELEMF
OGNRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7251
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4211
SMR RATING
1..100
9588
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5646
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
571
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ELEMF's Valuation (87) in the null industry is in the same range as OGNRF (99). This means that ELEMF’s stock grew similarly to OGNRF’s over the last 12 months.

OGNRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as ELEMF (42). This means that OGNRF’s stock grew similarly to ELEMF’s over the last 12 months.

OGNRF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as ELEMF (95). This means that OGNRF’s stock grew similarly to ELEMF’s over the last 12 months.

OGNRF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as ELEMF (56). This means that OGNRF’s stock grew similarly to ELEMF’s over the last 12 months.

OGNRF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ELEMF (57). This means that OGNRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ELEMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OGNRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
OGNRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

ELEMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ELEMF and EMPYF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ELEMF and EMPYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELEMF
1D Price
Change %
ELEMF100%
-1.48%
EMPYF - ELEMF
29%
Poorly correlated
+7.96%
PROBF - ELEMF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
SSVRF - ELEMF
28%
Poorly correlated
+3.35%
IMPUY - ELEMF
27%
Poorly correlated
-4.55%
OCGSF - ELEMF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
More

OGNRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OGNRF and RVLGF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OGNRF and RVLGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OGNRF
1D Price
Change %
OGNRF100%
+0.05%
RVLGF - OGNRF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
GLBKF - OGNRF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASM - OGNRF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.89%
ELEMF - OGNRF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.48%
ENDGF - OGNRF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More