Advertisement
ELEEF vs SNFCA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELEEF is a Hold and SNFCA is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ELEEF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSNFCA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ELEEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SNFCA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ELEEF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNFCA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ELEEF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SNFCA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ELEEF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +0.72% price change this week, while SNFCA (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +4.33% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +1.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.07%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.86%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+1.96% weekly)A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).
@Life/Health Insurance (+0.43% weekly)Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
| ELEEF | SNFCA | ELEEF / SNFCA | |
| Capitalization | 10.1B | 232M | 4,353% |
| EBITDA | 1.2B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.313 | -1.110 | 389% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.43 | 12.09 | 194% |
| Revenue | 2.26B | 342M | 661% |
| Total Cash | 169M | 128M | 132% |
| Total Debt | 9.47B | 123M | 7,699% |
ELEEF | SNFCA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 67 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 53 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ELEEF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNFCA (66) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that ELEEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNFCA’s over the last 12 months.
ELEEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNFCA (67) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that ELEEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNFCA’s over the last 12 months.
ELEEF's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNFCA (86) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that ELEEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNFCA’s over the last 12 months.
ELEEF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as SNFCA (61) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that ELEEF’s stock grew similarly to SNFCA’s over the last 12 months.
SNFCA's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as ELEEF (38) in the null industry. This means that SNFCA’s stock grew similarly to ELEEF’s over the last 12 months.
| ELEEF | SNFCA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 43% | 14 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 65% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IGEB | 45.88 | 0.09 | +0.19% |
| iShares Investment Grade Systmtc Bd ETF | |||
| PAMC | 49.33 | N/A | +0.01% |
| Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alt ETF | |||
| HECO | 45.49 | N/A | N/A |
| SPDR Galaxy Hdg Dgtl Ast Ecosystem ETF | |||
| DBL | 15.19 | -0.04 | -0.26% |
| Doubleline Opportunistic Credit Fund | |||
| DOGD | 19.50 | -1.11 | -5.40% |
| Tradr 2X Long DDOG Daily ETF | |||
ELEEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ELEEF and AER have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ELEEF and AER's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ELEEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELEEF | 100% | +0.97% | ||
| AER - ELEEF | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.69% | ||
| AXP - ELEEF | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
| CSASF - ELEEF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SNFCA - ELEEF | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.41% | ||
| QFIN - ELEEF | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.14% | ||
More | ||||
SNFCA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNFCA has been loosely correlated with PRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SNFCA jumps, then PRU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNFCA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNFCA | 100% | +2.41% | ||
| PRU - SNFCA | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| MET - SNFCA | 49% Loosely correlated | +2.04% | ||
| JXN - SNFCA | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| CNO - SNFCA | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| MFC - SNFCA | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.47% | ||
More | ||||