Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ELCIX vs FFAFX
ELCIX vs FFAFX Comparison
Open Charts ELCIX vs FFAFX
Eaton Vance Growth I
Price$43.82
Change-$6.94 (-13.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets438.57M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$79.38
Change-$9.63 (-10.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
ELCIX vs FFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. ELCIX (439M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than ELCIX: FFAFX (0.48) vs ELCIX (0.00). ELCIX was incepted earlier than FFAFX: ELCIX (19 years) vs FFAFX (5 years). ELCIX (0.79) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.34). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. ELCIX (18.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ELCIX: FFAFX (250) vs ELCIX (1000000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.01 vs. ELCIX (-2.12). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.47 vs. ELCIX (12.10).
| ELCIX | FFAFX | ELCIX / FFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.34 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.34 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.144 | -0.985 | 218% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 439M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.12 | 3.01 | -71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.46 | 46.16 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.10 | 15.47 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.31 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement