Advertisement
ELA vs FOSL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELA is a Hold and FOSL is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ELA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFOSL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ELA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- FOSL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ELA’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FOSL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ELA’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
- FOSL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ELA (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) experienced а +9.11% price change this week, while FOSL (@Wholesale Distributors) price change was +5.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry was +0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.06%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was -0.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.55%.
Reported Earning Dates
ELA is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
FOSL is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Catalog/Specialty Distribution (+0.09% weekly)The catalog and specialty distribution industry includes companies that offer retail through mail-order houses, media, online social platforms, mobile apps and other channels outside of brick-and-mortar stores. Several companies in this business partner with retail companies to assist them with marketing, digital solutions, warehousing, and/or other distribution capabilities. In essence, the industry acts as a potential catalyst for retailers/brands to widen their reach among customers. Pinduoduo Inc., Qurate Retail, Inc. and Baozun are some of the major players in this business.
@Wholesale Distributors (-0.55% weekly)Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.
| ELA | FOSL | ELA / FOSL | |
| Capitalization | 156M | 89.6M | 174% |
| EBITDA | 11.6M | -68.8M | -17% |
| Gain YTD | -16.574 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 18.15 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 189M | 1.12B | 17% |
| Total Cash | 21M | 78.3M | 27% |
| Total Debt | 18M | 322M | 6% |
ELA | FOSL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 52 Fair valued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 58 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ELA's Valuation (52) in the null industry is in the same range as FOSL (84) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that ELA’s stock grew similarly to FOSL’s over the last 12 months.
ELA's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as FOSL (100) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that ELA’s stock grew similarly to FOSL’s over the last 12 months.
ELA's SMR Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOSL (97) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that ELA’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOSL’s over the last 12 months.
FOSL's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry is in the same range as ELA (60) in the null industry. This means that FOSL’s stock grew similarly to ELA’s over the last 12 months.
ELA's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOSL (100) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that ELA’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOSL’s over the last 12 months.
| ELA | FOSL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 15 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 71% |
Advertisement
ELA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ELA and SIG have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ELA and SIG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ELA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELA | 100% | +0.67% | ||
| SIG - ELA | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.25% | ||
| BURBY - ELA | 21% Poorly correlated | -3.13% | ||
| FOSL - ELA | 19% Poorly correlated | -2.34% | ||
| TPR - ELA | 19% Poorly correlated | +0.56% | ||
| BRLT - ELA | 17% Poorly correlated | -8.95% | ||
More | ||||
FOSL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FOSL has been loosely correlated with MOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FOSL jumps, then MOV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FOSL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOSL | 100% | -2.34% | ||
| MOV - FOSL | 36% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| DBI - FOSL | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| SHOO - FOSL | 33% Loosely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| SKX - FOSL | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
| DECK - FOSL | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.21% | ||
More | ||||