EL
Price
$88.72
Change
+$0.14 (+0.16%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
55.26B
45 days until earnings call
SKIN
Price
$2.28
Change
+$0.17 (+8.06%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
528.89M
36 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EL vs SKIN

Header iconEL vs SKIN Comparison
Open Charts EL vs SKINBanner chart's image
Estee Lauder Companies (The)
Price$88.72
Change+$0.14 (+0.16%)
Volume$2.29M
Capitalization55.26B
Beauty Health Company (The)
Price$2.28
Change+$0.17 (+8.06%)
Volume$499.66K
Capitalization528.89M
EL vs SKIN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SKIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EL vs. SKIN commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EL is a Hold and SKIN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (EL: $88.72 vs. SKIN: $2.28)
Brand notoriety: EL and SKIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EL: 55% vs. SKIN: 56%
Market capitalization -- EL: $55.26B vs. SKIN: $528.89M
EL [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $55.26B. SKIN’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $528.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $381.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $25.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSKIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SKIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EL is a better buy in the long-term than SKIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SKIN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SKIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both EL and SKIN are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

EL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +12.26% price change this week, while SKIN (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +17.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +1.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

EL is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2025.

SKIN is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+1.91% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EL($55.3B) has a higher market cap than SKIN($529M). EL has higher P/E ratio than SKIN: EL (117.85) vs SKIN (53.48). SKIN YTD gains are higher at: 43.396 vs. EL (19.504). EL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.94B vs. SKIN (-56M). EL has more cash in the bank: 3.94B vs. SKIN (523M). SKIN has less debt than EL: SKIN (752M) vs EL (10.2B). EL has higher revenues than SKIN: EL (15.2B) vs SKIN (398M).
ELSKINEL / SKIN
Capitalization55.3B529M10,454%
EBITDA1.94B-56M-3,464%
Gain YTD19.50443.39645%
P/E Ratio117.8553.48220%
Revenue15.2B398M3,819%
Total Cash3.94B523M753%
Total Debt10.2B752M1,356%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EL: Fundamental Ratings
EL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
27
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ELSKIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SKIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASQCX14.440.14
+0.98%
American Century Small Company C
SSQSX17.150.12
+0.70%
State Street Instl Small-Cap Equity Svc
CSGCX44.290.23
+0.52%
Calvert Balanced C
PMACX12.640.03
+0.24%
Victory Pioneer Multi-Asset Income C
UEPSX19.08-0.01
-0.05%
ProFunds Europe 30 Svc

EL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EL has been loosely correlated with COTY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EL jumps, then COTY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EL
1D Price
Change %
EL100%
+0.16%
COTY - EL
55%
Loosely correlated
N/A
IPAR - EL
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
SPB - EL
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
ELF - EL
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.16%
HELE - EL
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.77%
More

SKIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SKIN and HNST have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SKIN and HNST's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SKIN
1D Price
Change %
SKIN100%
+8.06%
HNST - SKIN
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COTY - SKIN
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EL - SKIN
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
ELF - SKIN
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
IPAR - SKIN
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
More