Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWYX vs FSAGX
EKWYX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWYX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals Inst
Price$163.92
Change+$1.02 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.49B
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$65.72
Change+$0.27 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.21B
EKWYX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWYX vs. FSAGX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWYX is a Hold and FSAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 4.21B vs. EKWYX (1.49B). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWYX: FSAGX (2.17) vs EKWYX (1.49). EKWYX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWYX (26 years) vs FSAGX (40 years). EKWYX (0.85) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. EKWYX (14.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWYX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWYX (1000000). EKWYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 173.19 vs. FSAGX (156.07). EKWYX return over 5 years is better than : 229.13 vs. FSAGX (151.81).
| EKWYX | FSAGX | EKWYX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.68 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.68 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.265 | 11.957 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.49B | 4.21B | 35% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 2.17 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 173.19 | 156.07 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 244.41 | 178.77 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 229.13 | 151.81 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 690.80 | 477.71 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers