Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWYX vs FGADX
EKWYX vs FGADX Comparison
Open Charts EKWYX vs FGADX
Allspring Precious Metals Inst
Price$100.13
Change+$0.86 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets761.45M
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Adv
Price$33.86
Change+$0.54 (+1.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.65B
EKWYX vs FGADX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWYX vs. FGADX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWYX is a StrongBuy and FGADX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGADX has more cash in the bank: 1.65B vs. EKWYX (761M). FGADX pays higher dividends than EKWYX: FGADX (7.88) vs EKWYX (0.74). EKWYX was incepted earlier than FGADX: EKWYX (25 years) vs FGADX (29 years). EKWYX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FGADX (0.67). FGADX (14.50) and EKWYX (14.00) have comparable annual turnover. FGADX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWYX: FGADX (100000) vs EKWYX (1000000). FGADX (74.42) and EKWYX (72.94) have marching annual gain over last year. EKWYX return over 5 years is better than : 68.35 vs. FGADX (62.79).
| EKWYX | FGADX | EKWYX / FGADX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.67 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.67 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 75.513 | 78.775 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 761M | 1.65B | 46% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 7.88 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | 72.94 | 74.42 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 150.00 | 114.95 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.35 | 62.79 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 319.03 | 296.65 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement