Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWYX vs FGADX
EKWYX vs FGADX Comparison
Open Charts EKWYX vs FGADX
Allspring Precious Metals Inst
Price$114.05
Change+$2.75 (+2.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets903.58M
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Adv
Price$39.58
Change+$1.30 (+3.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
EKWYX vs FGADX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWYX vs. FGADX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWYX is a StrongBuy and FGADX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGADX has more cash in the bank: 1.94B vs. EKWYX (904M). FGADX pays higher dividends than EKWYX: FGADX (6.42) vs EKWYX (0.60). EKWYX was incepted earlier than FGADX: EKWYX (26 years) vs FGADX (29 years). EKWYX (0.85) is less costly to investors than FGADX (0.67). FGADX (14.50) and EKWYX (14.00) have comparable annual turnover. FGADX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWYX: FGADX (100000) vs EKWYX (1000000). FGADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 103.42 vs. EKWYX (94.76). EKWYX (91.47) and FGADX (87.45) have equivalent 5 years return.
| EKWYX | FGADX | EKWYX / FGADX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.67 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.67 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 99.912 | 108.976 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 904M | 1.94B | 47% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 6.42 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | 94.76 | 103.42 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 219.45 | 192.56 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 91.47 | 87.45 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 418.98 | 385.40 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement