Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWDX vs FGADX
EKWDX vs FGADX Comparison
Open Charts EKWDX vs FGADX
Allspring Precious Metals Admin
Price$91.04
Change+$0.54 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets662.99M
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Adv
Price$31.60
Change+$0.12 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.55B
EKWDX vs FGADX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWDX vs. FGADX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWDX is a Buy and FGADX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGADX has more cash in the bank: 1.55B vs. EKWDX (663M). FGADX pays higher dividends than EKWDX: FGADX (7.58) vs EKWDX (0.56). EKWDX was incepted earlier than FGADX: EKWDX (15 years) vs FGADX (29 years). EKWDX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FGADX (0.67). FGADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.50 vs. EKWDX (11.00). FGADX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWDX: FGADX (100000) vs EKWDX (1000000). EKWDX (72.58) and FGADX (70.83) have marching annual gain over last year. FGADX return over 5 years is better than : 77.74 vs. EKWDX (69.49).
| EKWDX | FGADX | EKWDX / FGADX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.67 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.67 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 61.133 | 66.843 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 663M | 1.55B | 43% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 7.58 | 7% |
| Returns for 1 year | 72.58 | 70.83 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 124.55 | 107.18 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.49 | 77.74 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 229.32 | 224.57 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement