Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWDX vs FGADX
EKWDX vs FGADX Comparison
Open Charts EKWDX vs FGADX
Allspring Precious Metals Admin
Price$99.06
Change+$0.85 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets761.45M
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Adv
Price$33.86
Change+$0.54 (+1.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.65B
EKWDX vs FGADX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWDX vs. FGADX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWDX is a StrongBuy and FGADX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGADX has more cash in the bank: 1.65B vs. EKWDX (761M). FGADX pays higher dividends than EKWDX: FGADX (7.88) vs EKWDX (0.58). EKWDX was incepted earlier than FGADX: EKWDX (15 years) vs FGADX (29 years). EKWDX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FGADX (0.67). FGADX (14.50) and EKWDX (14.00) have comparable annual turnover. FGADX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWDX: FGADX (100000) vs EKWDX (1000000). FGADX (74.42) and EKWDX (72.66) have marching annual gain over last year. EKWDX return over 5 years is better than : 67.27 vs. FGADX (62.79).
| EKWDX | FGADX | EKWDX / FGADX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.67 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.67 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 75.327 | 78.775 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 761M | 1.65B | 46% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 7.88 | 7% |
| Returns for 1 year | 72.66 | 74.42 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 148.83 | 114.95 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.27 | 62.79 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 313.41 | 296.65 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement