Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWDX vs FGADX
EKWDX vs FGADX Comparison
Open Charts EKWDX vs FGADX
Allspring Precious Metals Admin
Price$90.99
Change+$0.30 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets681.86M
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Adv
Price$32.22
Change-$0.33 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.58B
EKWDX vs FGADX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWDX vs. FGADX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWDX is a StrongBuy and FGADX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGADX has more cash in the bank: 1.59B vs. EKWDX (682M). FGADX pays higher dividends than EKWDX: FGADX (7.58) vs EKWDX (0.56). EKWDX was incepted earlier than FGADX: EKWDX (15 years) vs FGADX (29 years). EKWDX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FGADX (0.67). FGADX (14.50) and EKWDX (14.00) have comparable annual turnover. FGADX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWDX: FGADX (100000) vs EKWDX (1000000). FGADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 71.55 vs. EKWDX (66.39). FGADX return over 5 years is better than : 55.71 vs. EKWDX (49.53).
| EKWDX | FGADX | EKWDX / FGADX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.67 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.67 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 61.044 | 70.116 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 682M | 1.59B | 43% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 7.58 | 7% |
| Returns for 1 year | 66.39 | 71.55 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 146.15 | 127.43 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.53 | 55.71 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 313.84 | 308.34 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement