Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWDX vs FGADX
EKWDX vs FGADX Comparison
Open Charts EKWDX vs FGADX
Allspring Precious Metals Admin
Price$112.83
Change+$2.73 (+2.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets903.58M
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Adv
Price$39.58
Change+$1.30 (+3.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
EKWDX vs FGADX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWDX vs. FGADX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWDX is a StrongBuy and FGADX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGADX has more cash in the bank: 1.94B vs. EKWDX (904M). FGADX pays higher dividends than EKWDX: FGADX (6.42) vs EKWDX (0.48). EKWDX was incepted earlier than FGADX: EKWDX (15 years) vs FGADX (29 years). EKWDX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FGADX (0.67). FGADX (14.50) and EKWDX (14.00) have comparable annual turnover. FGADX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWDX: FGADX (100000) vs EKWDX (1000000). FGADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 103.42 vs. EKWDX (94.45). EKWDX (90.27) and FGADX (87.45) have equivalent 5 years return.
| EKWDX | FGADX | EKWDX / FGADX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.67 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.67 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 99.699 | 108.976 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 904M | 1.94B | 47% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 6.42 | 7% |
| Returns for 1 year | 94.45 | 103.42 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 218.02 | 192.56 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 90.27 | 87.45 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 412.06 | 385.40 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement