Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs SGGDX
EKWCX vs SGGDX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs SGGDX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$78.45
Change+$0.47 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets662.99M
EKWCX vs SGGDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. SGGDX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Buy and SGGDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGGDX has more cash in the bank: 3.69B vs. EKWCX (663M). SGGDX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: SGGDX (3.58) vs EKWCX (0.06). EKWCX was incepted earlier than SGGDX: EKWCX (27 years) vs SGGDX (32 years). EKWCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than SGGDX (1.16). SGGDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (11.00). EKWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGGDX: EKWCX (1000) vs SGGDX (2500). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 71.04 vs. SGGDX (50.60). SGGDX (65.16) and EKWCX (64.52) have equivalent 5 years return.
| EKWCX | SGGDX | EKWCX / SGGDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.16 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.16 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 60.429 | 48.261 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 663M | 3.69B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 3.58 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 71.04 | 50.60 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 119.34 | 87.77 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.52 | 65.16 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 205.80 | 192.73 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement