Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs SGGDX
EKWCX vs SGGDX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs SGGDX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$78.36
Change+$0.25 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets681.86M
EKWCX vs SGGDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. SGGDX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a StrongBuy and SGGDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGGDX has more cash in the bank: 3.75B vs. EKWCX (682M). SGGDX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: SGGDX (3.58) vs EKWCX (0.06). EKWCX was incepted earlier than SGGDX: EKWCX (28 years) vs SGGDX (32 years). EKWCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than SGGDX (1.16). SGGDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (14.00). EKWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGGDX: EKWCX (1000) vs SGGDX (2500). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 64.88 vs. SGGDX (46.14). SGGDX return over 5 years is better than : 49.14 vs. EKWCX (45.10).
| EKWCX | SGGDX | EKWCX / SGGDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.16 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.16 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 60.245 | 49.486 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 682M | 3.75B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 3.58 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 64.88 | 46.14 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 140.37 | 106.10 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.10 | 49.14 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 284.33 | 253.57 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement