Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs SGGDX
EKWCX vs SGGDX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs SGGDX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$80.91
Change+$1.38 (+1.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets669.9M
EKWCX vs SGGDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. SGGDX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Buy and SGGDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGGDX has more cash in the bank: 3.8B vs. EKWCX (670M). SGGDX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: SGGDX (3.67) vs EKWCX (0.06). EKWCX was incepted earlier than SGGDX: EKWCX (27 years) vs SGGDX (32 years). EKWCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than SGGDX (1.16). SGGDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (11.00). EKWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGGDX: EKWCX (1000) vs SGGDX (2500). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 86.82 vs. SGGDX (62.31). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 87.78 vs. SGGDX (83.01).
| EKWCX | SGGDX | EKWCX / SGGDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.16 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.16 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 65.460 | 53.004 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 670M | 3.8B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 3.67 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 86.82 | 62.31 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 112.28 | 86.63 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 87.78 | 83.01 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 207.19 | 195.67 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers