Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs SGGDX
EKWCX vs SGGDX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs SGGDX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$119.28
Change+$0.76 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.2B
EKWCX vs SGGDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. SGGDX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Buy and SGGDX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGGDX has more cash in the bank: 5.13B vs. EKWCX (1.2B). SGGDX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: SGGDX (2.44) vs EKWCX (0.04). EKWCX was incepted earlier than SGGDX: EKWCX (28 years) vs SGGDX (32 years). EKWCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than SGGDX (1.16). SGGDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (14.00). EKWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGGDX: EKWCX (1000) vs SGGDX (2500). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 121.74 vs. SGGDX (96.24). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 156.38 vs. SGGDX (131.93).
| EKWCX | SGGDX | EKWCX / SGGDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.16 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.16 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 142.372 | 112.569 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.2B | 5.13B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 2.44 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 121.74 | 96.24 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 204.02 | 148.96 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 156.38 | 131.93 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 438.61 | 378.28 | 116% |