Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs SGGDX
EKWCX vs SGGDX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs SGGDX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$113.43
Change-$7.40 (-6.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.17B
EKWCX vs SGGDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. SGGDX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Hold and SGGDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGGDX has more cash in the bank: 5.01B vs. EKWCX (1.17B). SGGDX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: SGGDX (2.67) vs EKWCX (0.04). EKWCX was incepted earlier than SGGDX: EKWCX (28 years) vs SGGDX (32 years). EKWCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than SGGDX (1.16). SGGDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (14.00). EKWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGGDX: EKWCX (1000) vs SGGDX (2500). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 102.45 vs. SGGDX (76.05). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 117.14 vs. SGGDX (103.22).
| EKWCX | SGGDX | EKWCX / SGGDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.16 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.16 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 131.963 | 103.241 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.17B | 5.01B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 2.67 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 102.45 | 76.05 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 263.90 | 187.63 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 117.14 | 103.22 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 373.05 | 321.44 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement